Do you mean an Article V convention is the equivalent of Obola's executive, extra legislative, unconstitutional amnesty?
In terms of thinking, in the way I laid it out, yes. I know, it’s different in terms of legality, but the idea is the same. Secure the border, then we’ll talk. Enforce the laws we have, and then we’ll talk. Same idea. Same concept. Different legalities, but same basic concept. Enforce the laws we have. If those laws don’t work, we can talk. But until those laws are enforced, there’s simply no reason to discuss more laws.