No. But its foundations are firmly fixed in Christian ideals. And our institutions cannot possibly endure without Christian morality.
John Adams:
"We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge or gallantry would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution is designed only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate for any other."
If that’s case, why don’t we have a theocracy?
Because we have a free republic, not a theocracy.
The threat of "theocracy" is nothing more than a boogie-man of the Left.
Why does the 1st Amendment exist as written?
To protect us from governmental tyranny against our God-given rights. You know, the way government is now tyrannizing us in the name of the humanistic, godless love affair with homosexuality.
Am I misunderstanding you?
Probably.
If I may clarify or seek clarification. Homosexuals like most lib groups prefer to be identified by the group they belong to and not as an individual. I am an individual, one not associated with that group. In fact, I am opposed to it.
Do you see me as just as dangerous as those people assuming what I have said is true. Based on your questions I assume you have doubts and think I might be some gay wizard sent to infiltrate and spike the FR water with fairy dust that will turn you all into fudge packers.
My point is can you separate me from the tyrannical movement you mention or do you believe regardless of how conservative I am, I am just as dangerous as an infantacidal homosexual child molester that wants to convert your children to the same?
Just curious for the purposes for future discussions.