If I may clarify or seek clarification. Homosexuals like most lib groups prefer to be identified by the group they belong to and not as an individual. I am an individual, one not associated with that group. In fact, I am opposed to it.
Do you see me as just as dangerous as those people assuming what I have said is true. Based on your questions I assume you have doubts and think I might be some gay wizard sent to infiltrate and spike the FR water with fairy dust that will turn you all into fudge packers.
My point is can you separate me from the tyrannical movement you mention or do you believe regardless of how conservative I am, I am just as dangerous as an infantacidal homosexual child molester that wants to convert your children to the same?
Just curious for the purposes for future discussions.
Frankly, I don’t trust claims to conservatism by those who deny the laws of nature. It’s like saying you want to preserve a building, while dynamiting its foundation.
I don’t hate you. I feel sorry for you.
But I simply don’t trust you.
That’s the honest truth.
Homosexuals, and those who are willing to accept homosexuality as a positive good, are well on the way to destroying what’s left of our free republic: our morality, our freedom of speech and religion, and even our very republican form of government.
The other part of this, of course, has nothing to do with your existence in America, it has to do with your participation in a privately-owned conservative forum, one that is dedicated to God, and to fighting the homosexual agenda.
That’s why I found your posts shocking, to say the least.
Of course, I’m not the owner of FR. I’m just a fourteen and a half year guest here. Who can post and who can’t is entirely up to the proprietor. It’s his house. Which has nothing therefore to do with the First Amendment, by the way. If he doesn’t like what either you or I say, he is completely within his rights to kick us out the door on our butts, as I’m sure you’ll agree.