Posted on 11/05/2014 9:58:55 AM PST by Yashcheritsiy
To begin with, this election was, generally speaking, a rejection of the notion being advanced by many in the establishment wing of the Party that the Republicans needs to move to the Left on social issues like abortion and gay “marriage.” Earlier this year, GOP establishment leaders like Kevin McCarthy and Paul Ryan announced their plan to begin trying to recruit “Young Gun” candidates – socially liberal, and often homosexual, candidates to run under the Republican banner in an effort to “broaden the appeal” of the Party, especially to younger, socially liberal voters. John Boehner backed this effort, throwing money at the candidates who had been recruited to run this year. However, the voters who were supposed to be impressed by the GOP’s lurch to the Left on “individual choice” issues instead reacted with a collective yawn. In the race for the open seat in Massachusetts’ 6th congressional district, “Young Gun” Richard Tisei - a gay Republican who has a 100% rating from NARAL and Planned Parenthood, who (obviously) supports gay “marriage,” and who is “married” to his “partner” - lost by 15 points to a non-incumbent and relatively unknown Democrat. To give this some perspective, Tisei had ran for the same seat in 2012 against a well-known and long-time incumbent and lost by only a single point. It does not appear that Tisei’s choice to flaunt his peculiar lifestyle choice did him or the GOP any favors this time around...
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
Shutting down businesses because owners refuse to conform
NAZI
Shutting down dissent
NAZI
Demanding access to other peoples children
NAZI
Wow. An open homosexual on Free Republic.
How progressive.
I have to admit I’ve never seen your screen name before now, and yet you have a five year-old account.
So, how long were you here before you “came out,” so to speak?
You can say that about any totalitarian dictatorship. Those are hardly unique to the NAZI’s. But you keep tossing them out there. I’m sure something will stick.
You can say that about any totalitarian dictatorship. Those are hardly unique to the NAZI’s. But you keep tossing them out there. I’m sure something will stick.
I have been around for some time. I just don’t go around screaming I hate men or gimme gay marriage. I try to stay away from homosexual related threads. I understand the suspicion people on FR have toward them, I share it. I denounce the homosexual agenda at every opportunity yet I still get attacked for it. Its fine, I’m not really here to convert anybody or to be converted. I do wonder if I agree on all conservative issues why do so many people here care who I sleep with. By the way, only 1 person my whole life.
GeronL is right.
Remember, it started slowly in Germany. First by shaming the Jews, then slowly by legislating them and their businesses, then legislating as undesirables and worthy to be exterminated.
The mental instability of homosexuals is very clear. So real conservatives don’t really want to reason or discuss the “virtues” of homosexuality or how to win their votes.
So, I really don’t care if you think this is bible thumping or not. But there is hope, I am sure you aware of it. If not, just ask.
Romans 1:..
22 Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools 23 and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like a mortal human being and birds and animals and reptiles.
24 Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. 25 They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.
26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. 27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.
28 Furthermore, just as they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge of God, so God gave them over to a depraved mind, so that they do what ought not to be done. 29 They have become filled with every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and depravity. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit and malice. They are gossips, 30 slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant and boastful; they invent ways of doing evil; they disobey their parents; 31 they have no understanding, no fidelity, no love, no mercy.
That website and its creators are as credible as the people that say Abraham Lincoln was homosexual. Silly that you even post that as a legitimate source.
You didn’t really answer my question, which was how long you were here before you “came out.”
Was it today?
Tierney, who's been bogged down by his wife's and in-laws' corruption (and maybe his own), lost to Seth Moulton, a Marine combat veteran of the Iraq War, in the Democratic primary, and it was curtains for Rich Tisei. Nominating Moulton was a surprisingly shrewd move for Democrats this year.
If things had been different, though, Republicans would have to figure out what to do about Tisei. But remember that Jim Kolbe and Steve Gunderson were both able to win elections after they were outed.
The information on that page is all well-documented and footnoted.
Why don't you deal with the information on the page instead of immediately attacking and trying to discredit its authors?
It's so progressively Alinskyite to do that.
I did answer it. In a number of posts I have denounced the homosexual agenda, and am as conservative as anyone here yet despite being in agreement with the mindset of FR I am still attacked because I am a lesbian. So no, I did not just come out today.
Okay. We’re making progress. It wasn’t today. So when was it, approximately? Five years ago? Last week? A month ago? A year? What?
Because I’m a daily reader of FR, and I’ve never once seen posts by an open homosexual before. I’m just trying to get a handle on this.
Should I go through all the well documented and footnoted global warming reports? I will reject your gay NAZI website assertion for the same reason I reject the global warming assertion, they are both utterly and pathetically ridiculous on their face.
Were the NAZI’s homo’s? Lol I really doubt it closet homos maybe. Are homosexuals NAZI’s? No.
Do homosexuals adopt NAZI, Communist, and other totalitarian and authoritarian tactics to achieve their aims? Absolutely they do. Are they a danger to your children? Absolutely they are.
The idea that NAZI’s were homo lovers, just curious how you build a master Aryan race using homosexuals?
Again, the historical information presented there is very well-documented.
You sure deploy a lot of straw men.
You don’t give very direct answers to questions either.
Years, its been nothing new. I don’t have an exact date.
I said approximately. So “years” is specific enough.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.