Here's something to brighten your day!
1 posted on
10/30/2014 9:22:53 AM PDT by
Parmenio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 next last
To: Parmenio; Liz; LucyT; Dilbert San Diego; Nailbiter; SueRae; NativeSon; lurk; Ann Archy; Parmy; ...
59 posted on
10/30/2014 9:42:27 AM PDT by
GOPJ
( Are You More Likely to be Infected or Beheaded Today Than You Were 6 Years Ago? freeperPROCON)
To: Parmenio
that means they will become subject to obozocare
To: Parmenio
I will search in vain for the tear-jerker stories from 2006 when Republicans lost Congressional majorities.
61 posted on
10/30/2014 9:42:55 AM PDT by
AU72
To: Parmenio
Paul Bedard knows something about this story, too. From early, hard-won experience. I have a feeling there's some schadenfreude motivating his decision to write this story.
62 posted on
10/30/2014 9:42:57 AM PDT by
Prospero
(Si Deus trucido mihi, ego etiam fides Deus.)
To: Parmenio
And if the GOP has any backbone, more than a dozen “Czars” that are unconstitutional at best and likely illegal.
To: Parmenio
If it really happens....I'll wallow in the Schadenfreude.
64 posted on
10/30/2014 9:44:23 AM PDT by
clintonh8r
( BRILLIANT, WITTY (but incendiary)TAG LINE REMOVED BY MODERATORS.)
To: Parmenio
Women & minorities impacted most...
68 posted on
10/30/2014 9:45:10 AM PDT by
rjsimmon
(The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
To: Parmenio
Gee, where is the crying towel?
69 posted on
10/30/2014 9:45:29 AM PDT by
lesko
To: Parmenio
What’s their problem? They will probably be fired on one day, and then re-hired the following day by the new GOP(e) lawmaker.
71 posted on
10/30/2014 9:45:47 AM PDT by
C210N
(When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
To: Parmenio
“WOMEN, MINORITIES TO SUFFER MOST”
72 posted on
10/30/2014 9:45:51 AM PDT by
clintonh8r
( BRILLIANT, WITTY (but incendiary)TAG LINE REMOVED BY MODERATORS.)
To: Parmenio
What waste. That many people are needed to support Democrat members? Paid for by our taxes?
74 posted on
10/30/2014 9:46:34 AM PDT by
combat_boots
(The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
To: Parmenio
Democratic House staffers did just fine after 2010, as did Republican staffers in 2006. Senior ones go to lobby shops, private equity shops, think tanks, visiting professorships at policy schools, and investment banks. Junior ones go to independent expenditure groups, law school, business school, “back home” to start their own political careers, etc.
To: Parmenio
The good thing is that they can get the “affordable” healthcare that they championed!
/sarc
78 posted on
10/30/2014 9:47:49 AM PDT by
Preachin'
(I stand with many voters who will never vote for a pro abortion candidate.)
To: Parmenio
Sorry to deflate your balloon, but when RINO Scott Brown assumed the Senate seat formerly held by the guy that put the blonde in the pond, he kept most of the staffers.
To: Parmenio
The peons on the bottom of the staffing ladder who do most of the actual work tend to drift from place to place anyway. Senator X's office will fire them and Senator Y's office will quickly hire them.
The number of people willing to live six to a flat on the Green line and work for relatively niggardly wages is more finite than most people think.
82 posted on
10/30/2014 9:50:06 AM PDT by
Vigilanteman
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
To: Parmenio; All
Under a Senate deal cut by Majority Leader Harry Reid and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, the funding and staff breakdown on committees is about 60 percent for the majority, and 40 percent for the minority.....the GOP cut the deal in order to keep their minimum funding at 40 percent.
Anyone wanna guess what kind of deal Mitch cut with Harry??? I wonder if the deal included Lindsey Graham having to perform sexual favors for Democrats?
91 posted on
10/30/2014 9:57:43 AM PDT by
Din Maker
(I've always been crazy, but, that's the only thing that's kept me from going insane.)
To: Parmenio
Fired? That's so 90's, they wouldn't be fired they would be given the freedom to not work and "pursue ... opportunity to pursue their dreams"
92 posted on
10/30/2014 9:57:58 AM PDT by
Mastador1
(I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
To: Parmenio
I doubt that they would be fired. They would lose their jobs, however. When your employer goes out of business you lose your job.
93 posted on
10/30/2014 9:58:35 AM PDT by
arthurus
To: Parmenio
To: Parmenio
Unemployment to be happy about!
98 posted on
10/30/2014 10:04:10 AM PDT by
CityCenter
(Resist Obamacare!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson