Indeed, they should focusing on the MANY races with pro-family Republicans running against scum, instead of endorsing a filthy piece of rat garbage like Peters. It’s moronic.
I’m no fan of Sicko DeMaio, but he’d be far better than the RAT Peters on economic issues. And given that the district isn’t exactly a hotbed of conservatism (Romney was held to 45.7% in the CD), it would be very risky to reelect Peters in the faint hopes that in 2016 (a presidential year) we’d be able to get a conservative Republican to finish in the top two in the jungle primary and then beat Peters one-on-one on Election Day. So if I lived in that district I’d hold my nose and vote for DeMaio, but I wouldn’t send him a dime (let him fundraise from his Log Cabin pals).