She married her mother’s half-brother. The judge ruled that this was the genetic equivalent to ‘cousin’ which that state allowed marriages between.
The article is misleading. The court did not invalidate the prohibition of full uncle-niece marriages.
She married her mother’s half-brother. The judge ruled that this was the genetic equivalent to ‘cousin’ which that state allowed marriages between.”
“The article is misleading. The court did not invalidate the prohibition of full uncle-niece marriages.”
Nice to see that I was not the only one to read the entire article and pay attention to the details.
“She married her mother’s half-brother. The judge ruled that this was the genetic equivalent to ‘cousin’ which that state allowed marriages between.
The article is misleading. The court did not invalidate the prohibition of full uncle-niece marriages.”
___________________________________________________________
Stop making sense!! /s
Give them time as this case will be used as a foundation upon which the case for legally sanctioned incest will be built.
So, what’s the rationale for prohibition of step brothers and sisters marrying, if no bloodlines are intermingled?