Posted on 10/28/2014 5:34:31 AM PDT by Kaslin
The Democratic Party is systematically destroying America and other than Barack Obama, no one deserves more blame for it than Harry Reid. He may be an excellent politician who runs circles around Mitch McConnell the way Bugs Bunny baffles Elmer Fudd, but he's also a habitually dishonest, mean-spirited sociopath who cares absolutely nothing about the good of the country. The Democrat senators who put Reid into power and went along with Obama deserve to be punished for what they’ve done.
Certainly, that doesn't mean the Republicans are wonderful. Just the fact that they allow themselves to be led by a mediocrity like Mitch McConnell tells you a lot. So does the fact that Ted Cruz is talked about as if he’s this wild-eyed, radical conservative. Don't get me wrong: Ted Cruz is my favorite senator and I can't say enough good things about him. But really, what makes Ted Cruz so special? That he's smart? Aren't senators supposed to be smart? Is he unique because he effectively attacks the Democrats? Aren't Republicans supposed to do that? Is Ted Cruz a stand-out because he behaves as if he believes in all the things he said on the campaign trail? Really? Aren’t Republicans supposed to believe in the things they say on the campaign trail? In a sense, the most remarkable thing about Ted Cruz is that he IS so remarkable despite doing little more than what the average Republican in the Senate should be doing in the first place.
That being said, while we shouldn’t put the Senate Republicans up on a pedestal, we also shouldn’t underestimate how bad the Senate Democrats have become. So, why is it so important to beat the Democrats?
1) It helps check Obama’s power: Politically, what we’ve seen in recent years is that the party out of power benefits tremendously from hunkering down, saying “no” and refusing to cooperate. For the most part, the Republican Party has done just that. The problem with that approach is Barack Obama doesn’t care about the Constitution, doesn’t care about the law and is acting more like a king than a President. We’ve desperately needed the Republican Party to do more than meekly complain about it and they just haven’t stepped up to the plate because they’ve adopted the, “We’re out of power, so the best thing we can do is nothing” mentality. On the other hand, if Republicans control the House and the Senate, they will quite rightfully be expected to DO SOMETHING when Obama overreaches. How much will they do? How effective will they be? That’s hard to say with two pitiful sad sacks like John Boehner and Mitch McConnell in charge, but you can be guaranteed they’ll step it up simply because the media, the establishment and the general populace will now join grassroots conservatives in expecting them to take action. A Republican Party that is just as timid in the majority as they are in the minority has nothing to offer the country and they know that.
2) It enables Republicans to set the table for 2016: The House Republicans have more than 350 bills that have died in the Senate without a vote; yet they’re the ones getting blamed for being obstructionists. If the GOP controls the Senate, suddenly Democrats are going to have to start taking tough votes again. That means they’ll have to vote against popular legislation or even better, they’ll go along with Republicans, pass it and send it up to Obama. Then either Obama signs the bills into law or he becomes the obstructionist, vetoes the bills and gives our 2016 candidate strong issues to run on. Moreover, he puts the Democrat candidate in a tough spot. Do Democrats make their supporters angry by saying that the Republicans were right and Obama was wrong to veto the bill or do they continue to support his unpopular vetoes? Let’s leave their 2016 Presidential candidate defending an unpopular, obstructionist President while our candidate will have a readymade raft of popular issues to run on for once.
3) If we don’t get it done in 2014, we sure won’t get it done in 2016: This year, the number of Democrat senators up for reelection in red states is heavily tilted towards the Republican Party. In 2016, the math will run the other way and Republicans will have to defend 24 out of the 34 seats up for reelection. Moreover, most of those Democrat seats will be in safe districts while at least 10 of the Republican seats will likely be in competitive states. If Obama’s popularity continues to sink and we win the presidency, could we hold enough of those seats to keep the Senate? Yes, but obviously we need to pad our totals as much as possible this year to give us a chance to do that. If we’re going to have any kind of opportunity to move the ball forward on the deficit, Obamacare, foreign policy, taxes, protecting the 2nd Amendment or any of the other issues we care about, we’re going to need Republicans in the Senate that we can beat, threaten and cajole into doing the right thing.
4) It will improve the quality of GOP legislation: Putting Republicans in charge of the Senate will take a big excuse away from the Republicans on issues like immigration. Ironically, the reason the House leadership Republicans were so hell-bent on passing it this year was BECAUSE they feared the GOP would take over the Senate. Truthfully, they’d rather have a bad bill that codifies open borders and amnesty that they could blame on Harry Reid. Then, the line would have been something like, “We know it’s not the greatest bill, but what do you expect when we have to work with Harry Reid?” That same principle applies to Obamacare, the deficit and a number of other issues. If the GOP runs the House and the Senate, Republicans can’t take a show vote, then embrace some left-wing bill and blame it on the Democrats. Since the GOP leadership is comprised of country club Republican idiots, we still have to worry about the legislation they’ll pass, but at least we’ll be sure that it’ll be better than anything they could have done this year.
5) It’s a necessary rebuke of Obama: We all know that Democrats are never going to publicly admit that Barack Obama is the worst President in American history. However, even fanatically loyal, dumb Democrats can do basic addition and subtraction.
By the time Obamacare came up for a vote, the Democrats had control of the presidency, 60 seats in the Senate and 257 seats in the House. That is about as far as the scale can tip in their favor and so if the GOP ends up with overwhelming control in the House and a majority in the Senate, Obama will get the blame just as Jimmy Carter did for Ronald Reagan. Democrats can toss out all the propaganda they want, but if they know that moving way off to the Left will lead to crushing defeats at the ballot box, it will shake their nerve and they’re likely to be more moderate for a while out of fear. Like most Republican politicians, Democrat politicians care more about keeping their cushy jobs than anything else. That’s why we need to take some of those jobs away to change their behavior.
As an extra added bonus, it will give the Democrats a strong incentive to try to prevent Obama from further hurting the party with his outlandish executive orders. Will that slow him down? Maybe it will, maybe it won’t, but if he starts getting calls from senators, donors, activists, unions and the rest of the people he listens to telling him not to make any big moves, it may give him cold feet. Obama may not care about America, but even he doesn’t want to be remembered as another Jimmy Carter whose buffoonery ended up helping Republicans more than Democrats in the end
6) Senate Democrats need to be punished for what they’ve done: My days of telling people to vote for the “lesser of two evils” are over, but there are still times that you need to vote to punish the people in charge for doing the wrong thing. Are you going to let Democrats who voted for Obamacare get away with it? Are you going to reward them for enabling Barack Obama’s unconstitutional, un-American, and oftentimes illegal executive orders? When far left-wingers like Michelle Nunn in Georgia or Greg Orman in Kansas insult your intelligence by pretending not to be liberals, are you just going to take it? These people aren’t acting any differently than they would if their goal is to destroy the United States; so how can you just shrug that off? At a minimum, these Democrats who’ve hurt you, your children, and your country need to see their cushy jobs disappear for what their party has done to America.
This election and the one in 2016 are the most important ones in our lives
After the election is over, and after the Republicans have taken the Senate, and after not much still changes, some of us will remember the FR posters who asked that all conservative FReepers sell out to the Republican Party...again.
They're running this thing like it's a giant telethon and winning is collecting more money than the dems. Imagine where they'd be, in the polls and with the money situation, if they hadn't spent millions to defeat constitutional conservatives in primaries.
At this point, except for the disgusting Mississippi situation, I hope all the Repulicans who can do so will win. Not because I think they'll save the nation. But because Obama is in outright war against US citizens, culture, and civilization. We need to get his crowd out of power, before they do even more deliberate damage.
JMHO
I think we could wind up with as many as +10 seats in the end.
A pickup of 8 in the election is within reach, and 2 RAT senators are likely to jump to the GOP from WV and ME.
That would be enough to override a veto with 5 moderate RATS on popular bills like the Keystone pipeline.
The last senator from Massachusetts, Edward Brooke, was about as left as people like Schumer etc. Scott Brown was a TX conservative compared to him and probably the best possible in a state like MA. He may not be a Gordon Humphrey, but Brown’s commitment to closing the border has given me the incentive to actually donate to him get rid of shrill lefty Shaheen.
Urge every single person you know, regardless of political stripe to vote against all and every Democrat Candidate running for office and politcally destroy the Obamabot, Democrat Party!!!
We, the American people, are living in total politcal chaos.....Obama fails to lead on any critical issue and with the EBOLA and ISIS situations, he has placed the country in serious harm’s way across the board!!! if we turn out and vote, destroying the Democrat Party, politically...we instanly make POTUS, Obama an instant “Lame Duck” POTUS!!! American voters.......across the entire nation, vote against “ALL” Democrats across the board and save our great country!!!
Last GOP senator from MA
Both parties are steering us toward communism, it’s just that the Democrats are driving a little bit faster. Voting for the GOPe is voting against my young children’s futures; after all, they have proven that they will do NOTHING to stop obama’s agenda. I must fight this battle now so that they are spared from war. Voting third party assures a Dem win, which leads to a faster destruction that I can clean up. I don’t want my babies cleaning up a mess I was too cowardly to do.
I have decided not to vote for our mayor who is running for reelection, because she is a rat and didn't like nothing better than vote for every tax increase when she was in the Tennessee State House of reps.
Her two opponents who are also rats are not any better either and I refuse to vote for any rat
Exactly.
The closest the typical Republican Senate candidate comes to an issue is “I wish Obama wasn’t President and I wish Obamacare hadn’t passed.” Guess what: Obama will be President for two more years no matter what, and Obamacare cannot be repealed and the GOP Senate certainly won’t push the government shutdown face-off that would be required to defund it.
There is a freedom and prosperity agenda that is begging for advocates, and isn’t getting it.
The thing I worry about most in a GOP victory next week is that they’ll take it as a mandate for their do-nothing agenda.
I’m all in for Scott Brown (and I think he’s going to win). What else can I do?
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Down here in Southeast Texas, local politicians have what they call “Ten Tells Ten”. Tell 10 people to vote for Scott Brown and ask them to tell 10 people to vote for Brown and to tell “their ten” to tell 10 people to vote for Scott Brown....... Do the math.
I remember being so angry when Glenn Beck made it his top priority for about a week to make sure no one was really that happy that Brown def. Coakely for the Kennedy Seat in Mass.
He was totally tone deaf on that - it’s like he has no idea that Mass and Texas just ain’t gonna vote for the same kind of folks. Not happening. Ever.
Agree. However, its going to be work just arguing with them for the next 2 years.
I early voted for Lamar Alexander - who stinks!
“It will only get worse if we don’t take the abusive power from Harry Reid et al.”
It gets worse under RINOs too.... (Read tag line)
“GET A CLUE< IT ONLY HELPS THE RATS”
Every reason in the article can easily be applied to Republicans.
Blah Blah Blah!
The same list of crap that got us a congress and senate full of RINOS. We wouldn’t be here now if people had held to convictions.
I know that we can’t expect candidates to be perfect, but anyone who is full fledged rino(leftist) won’t be getting my vote anymore.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.