Yep, they said it. Link here
http://www.usatoday.com/story/nation/2014/10/26/defense-threat-reduction-agency-ebola-treatment/17954499/
Thanks for the link. The document refers to this study. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04778.x/full
The aerostable test was measuring decay rate in MINUTES. It is not clear but if the deliberate carefully created aerosolization was done the same way they did the filovirus earlier it was aerosolized with tissue culture, and they definitely also included Bacillus atrophaeus spores. So whatever any fearmonger might tell you, when the try their best to weaponize it, it still only has a decay rate measured in minutes.
The life in liquid test also included tissue cells, necessary for replication and life. And the dry surface test were at very cold temperatures.
None of these have any practical value unless you are trying to weaponize the virus. Or perhaps if you are directly exposed to cell rich liquids like vomit, on cold surfaces.