Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PeteB570

100lbs. is close to 100% of a female’s body weight. I’m no physiologist, but I can’t imagine there would be that many females able to carry that amount of weight for extended periods of time, let alone in the mountains of afcrapistan...


116 posted on 10/26/2014 2:32:50 PM PDT by SZonian (Throwing our allegiances to political parties in the long run gave away our liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]


To: SZonian

What many people forget is that what you were when you were committed to combat is not what you come out.

I served my first tour in VN in 1965-1967, I went in at 165# and left at 135#, baby fat, I went from a 32 inch waste to a 29 inch waste.

There is more involved than humping a 125# in training.


136 posted on 10/26/2014 3:10:05 PM PDT by Little Bill (EVICT Queen Jean)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

To: SZonian

100lbs. is close to 100% of a female’s body weight. I’m no physiologist, but I can’t imagine there would be that many females able to carry that amount of weight for extended periods of time, let alone in the mountains of afcrapistan...

________________

Are you joking. Have you seen the latest graduating class at any high school? 160 to 200 is not unusual. All fat.


138 posted on 10/26/2014 3:10:47 PM PDT by Chickensoup (Leftist totalitarian fascism is on the move.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson