It will be interesting to see if “They’ll take care of you at the chapel down the street” will work, or if the offended couple will insist on a lawsuit to make THOSE chapels carry out the service.
Ok, here we go.
Will wedding places be allowed to refuse to perform homosexual marriages due to religious belief?? Court cases will happen very soon on this issue.
I hate to think what sort of “protests” the spurned...”gay” “couples” might engage in.
Theres power in numbers or there used to be....
Hopefully the owners of the Wedding Chapels will prevail.
The last thing I would want as a prospective customer to a Wedding Chapel like these is to show up there with my honey and have to see the endings of a same sex marriage. I just would go someplace else. Business, and convictions. It’s called freedom.
The next big battle will be religious liberty versus freedom of worship. Obama says you have the freedom to worship on Sundays at your church of choice and that’s it. The founders believe that religious liberty is a 24/7 proposition regardless of where or when you worship.
The American Communist Lawyers’ Union
... A kosher butcher will not slice your ham for you even if I bring it in and ask nice.
If churches can refuse to perform marriage ceremonies for previously-married people, then they should be able to refuse to perform ceremonies for homosexuals, or for any other category of persons.
How is it that homosexuals are more special than divorced heterosexuals?
Churches are exempt
If you want to get hitched see a judge
And leave heteros the hell alone?
Yeah, I know, they want to tear hetero marriages apart. But still, just get your own ministers, already.
They aren’t breaking the law.
They are breaking the declarations of unelected tyrants.
So good for them.
Why not just do the “wedding” and for the readings do the biblical statements on homosexuality?
Homosexual SOBs would be lucky not to be chased off with a shotgun loaded with rock salt.
When even the for-profit, quickie wedding shacks in Vegas won’t perform your so-called wedding, you know you’ve hit bottom.
Check the specific terminology here “for profit” as if there’s a difference in a persons rights depending on whether or not they’re making money off of it. Theres no such delineation. But the socialists WANT it to be to further regulate and control the flow of wealth. You can believe whatever you want but you can’t make a livelihood off of it (write books, actually DO things, etc)
Abnormal people seeking special treatment for tax reasons not working.