Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/24/2014 8:29:20 AM PDT by redreno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: redreno

It will be interesting to see if “They’ll take care of you at the chapel down the street” will work, or if the offended couple will insist on a lawsuit to make THOSE chapels carry out the service.


2 posted on 10/24/2014 8:31:25 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: redreno

Ok, here we go.

Will wedding places be allowed to refuse to perform homosexual marriages due to religious belief?? Court cases will happen very soon on this issue.


3 posted on 10/24/2014 8:31:40 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: redreno

I hate to think what sort of “protests” the spurned...”gay” “couples” might engage in.

Theres power in numbers or there used to be....

Hopefully the owners of the Wedding Chapels will prevail.


4 posted on 10/24/2014 8:31:59 AM PDT by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: redreno

The last thing I would want as a prospective customer to a Wedding Chapel like these is to show up there with my honey and have to see the endings of a same sex marriage. I just would go someplace else. Business, and convictions. It’s called freedom.


5 posted on 10/24/2014 8:33:00 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: redreno

The next big battle will be religious liberty versus freedom of worship. Obama says you have the freedom to worship on Sundays at your church of choice and that’s it. The founders believe that religious liberty is a 24/7 proposition regardless of where or when you worship.


6 posted on 10/24/2014 8:33:45 AM PDT by HOYA97 (twitter @hoya97)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: redreno
Even the City of Sin won't have 'em. LOL.

11 posted on 10/24/2014 8:38:06 AM PDT by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: redreno

The American Communist Lawyers’ Union


14 posted on 10/24/2014 8:39:17 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Islamopobia:The Irrational Fear Of Being Beheaded)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: redreno
So question ...i am a business that offer a religious service.. don't i have the right to only offer what meet that standard... if the ACLU content the bible must not be in the public square. . Does that mean i can not offer a service that includes the bible and its standard?

... A kosher butcher will not slice your ham for you even if I bring it in and ask nice.

15 posted on 10/24/2014 8:40:51 AM PDT by tophat9000 (An Eye for an Eye, a Word for a Word...nothing more)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: redreno

If churches can refuse to perform marriage ceremonies for previously-married people, then they should be able to refuse to perform ceremonies for homosexuals, or for any other category of persons.

How is it that homosexuals are more special than divorced heterosexuals?


16 posted on 10/24/2014 8:41:13 AM PDT by ChicagahAl (Don't blame me. I voted for Sarah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: redreno

Churches are exempt

If you want to get hitched see a judge


17 posted on 10/24/2014 8:42:04 AM PDT by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: redreno
Why don't the homos and lesbos and trannies get their own ordination certificates from the Internet and perform their own ceremonies?

And leave heteros the hell alone?

Yeah, I know, they want to tear hetero marriages apart. But still, just get your own ministers, already.

19 posted on 10/24/2014 8:45:10 AM PDT by Slyfox (To put on the mind of George Washington read all of Deuteronomy 28)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: redreno

They aren’t breaking the law.

They are breaking the declarations of unelected tyrants.

So good for them.


20 posted on 10/24/2014 8:48:00 AM PDT by chris37 (heartless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: redreno

Why not just do the “wedding” and for the readings do the biblical statements on homosexuality?


21 posted on 10/24/2014 8:51:00 AM PDT by rogator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: redreno

Homosexual SOBs would be lucky not to be chased off with a shotgun loaded with rock salt.


22 posted on 10/24/2014 8:51:11 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: redreno

When even the for-profit, quickie wedding shacks in Vegas won’t perform your so-called wedding, you know you’ve hit bottom.


23 posted on 10/24/2014 8:52:26 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: redreno

Check the specific terminology here “for profit” as if there’s a difference in a persons rights depending on whether or not they’re making money off of it. Theres no such delineation. But the socialists WANT it to be to further regulate and control the flow of wealth. You can believe whatever you want but you can’t make a livelihood off of it (write books, actually DO things, etc)


32 posted on 10/24/2014 9:18:26 AM PDT by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: redreno

Abnormal people seeking special treatment for tax reasons not working.


33 posted on 10/24/2014 9:20:04 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson