Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nachum

Ultimately, tho, the 2A supporters here on FR should be in agreement with her refusal to the breathalyzer.

Whether inebriated or not, she did not use/brandish the weapon and informed the po-po that she had a license. If the officer smelled alcohol on her breath, that is not sufficient evidence -in this instance- to require a BAC blow; she was not operating a vehicle.


47 posted on 10/21/2014 12:51:34 PM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cletus.D.Yokel

Ultimately, tho, the 2A supporters here on FR should be in agreement with her refusal to the breathalyzer.

Whether inebriated or not, she did not use/brandish the weapon and informed the po-po that she had a license. If the officer smelled alcohol on her breath, that is not sufficient evidence -in this instance- to require a BAC blow; she was not operating a vehicle.
Yes, and in MO, no laws were broken as to carrying while drinking. In order to get charged with unlawful use of a weapon, she would have to have to brandish or otherwise handle the fireare.


56 posted on 10/21/2014 2:06:27 PM PDT by Currentriverrat ((Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson