I was really cheering you on until I got to your non sequitor at the end. Really, I appreciate the history of the quotes. Great job.
How do you still cling to your bitter "there's a huge difference between the parties" idiotic meme, when the clear evidence, which I cited in my post, shows just the opposite?
You really think there is a material difference between the RINOcrat Uniparty and the Democrats? I will grant you that there is a slight difference in that the Republicans do have a few conservatives in their ranks, where as the Democrats have none.
But as you can see, the GOPe is doing everything it can to make sure those conservatives can't get anything done, and works to defeat them in the primaries.
I do wish so-called conservatives would get their heads out of their butts and look at reality.
I will predict that with the RINOs in charge of the Senate between now and 2016, we will get another RINO loser presidential candidate in 2016.
Can you say President Hillary (or worse, President Warren?)
There is certainly a difference between Republicans and Democrats. Democrats are actively evil. Republicans are only passively evil.
There is certainly a difference between Republicans and Democrats. Democrats are aggressively totalitarian. Republicans are less aggressive.
We just disagree on how to get from here to there. I think a "take-over" of the existing gOpE is the better strategy. Yes, it will be a long hard slog. Yes, it might be going two steps backward before another one forward. Yes, it would be frustrating as hell. But it would be a strategy of incrementalized gains.
You appear to prefer the 'blow up the gop and start a new party' strategy. I expect that would only serve the liberal democRATS and the country would be destroyed before the new party could ever win the WH.
IMHO, the low-information voters, the product of our government schools and this media-driven culture of depravity, will never elect a POTUS from a new conservative party because the Michael Moore wing is ~40% of this idiotic electorate.