Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UN experts: Detroit should restore water to poor
Associated Press ^ | Oct 20, 2014 6:28 PM EDT | Jeff Karoub

Posted on 10/20/2014 9:07:40 PM PDT by Olog-hai

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 last
To: cripplecreek

Lake Huron....is not that far from Detroit...

maybe the UN can BUY Lake Huron...and build a pipeline to the “poorer” neighborhoods....?


61 posted on 10/21/2014 7:41:37 AM PDT by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I support the UN findings. In Michigan, you are never more than six miles from navigable water. Each family shall be given, at no charge one five gallon pail per family member with a sealed lid and one gallon of bleach per year. They can walk, or on their own find alternate transportation to a water source and thus have a limitless supply of free water.


62 posted on 10/21/2014 9:23:16 AM PDT by cyclotic (Join America's premier outdoor adventure association for boys-traillifeusa.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnBovenmyer

shouldn’t need to do that, there was a ton of flooding in detroit this year.


63 posted on 10/21/2014 10:22:05 AM PDT by absolootezer0 (2x divorced tattooed pierced harley hatin meghan mccain luvin' REAL beer drinkin' smoker ..what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: reardensteel

Go down to the creek and get all the water you want. If you want it purified, disinfected and delivered to the showerhead in your home, it’s going to cost you because people are employed to make that shower happen. Somebody dug and maintains a well or a dozen wells. Somebody else connects and repairs pipes and somebody else works the water treatment plant which uses electricity. All those somebodies have salaries, vacation plans, retirement plans and sick days that must be paid. The company has an electric bill and payroll. No sympathy from the California dust bowl, where we beg for every drop and growing food is more important than two showers a day.


64 posted on 10/21/2014 12:47:26 PM PDT by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Everything should be free!


65 posted on 10/21/2014 12:53:31 PM PDT by CSM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reardensteel

“Denying people water? I’m all for people pulling their weight, but water? That makes no sense. We aren’t talking about landscaping and golf courses. Water to drink and wash should never be denied to people, money or no money.”

Seeing this posted by someone with your moniker is astounding....or you forgot your sarc tag....

There is a huge river that every detroit resident can access. They can take all of the buckets they want and get all of the free water they can carry....


66 posted on 10/21/2014 12:58:39 PM PDT by CSM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: reardensteel
Water to drink and wash should never be denied to people, money or no money.

Fine, you pay for it.

67 posted on 10/21/2014 12:59:57 PM PDT by dfwgator (The "Fire Muschamp" tagline is back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I see people on here who think that people who don’t pay their water bills should have their water shut off. I can agree with that but then some go on to say, “except for the truly needy”.

Nope, not even for the “truly needy”. Find that in the constitution for me please. I don’t owe anybody’s water bill but my own.

If my neighbor or a relative falls on hard times and needs my help, I will be the one who decides whether they are “truly needy” or not. It should never be up to the government to decide which people get my money as welfare.


68 posted on 10/21/2014 1:20:48 PM PDT by Graybeard58 (Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man. Eccl 12 V.13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Nor was this appropriation of any parcel of land, by improving it, any prejudice to any other man, since there was still enough and as good left, and more than the yet unprovided could use. So that, in effect, there was never the less left for others because of his enclosure for himself. For he that leaves as much as another can make use of does as good as take nothing at all. Nobody could think himself injured by the drinking of another man, though he took a good draught, who had a whole river of the same water left him to quench his thirst. And the case of land and water, where there is enough of both, is perfectly the same.

John Locke

Man has a natural right to water, because without it there can be no life. To deny a man water is tyranny. What would Locke say? Or, what would Jesus say?


69 posted on 10/21/2014 10:47:46 PM PDT by reardensteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: reardensteel

Again, who gets to pay for their water if they don’t pay for it themselves?


70 posted on 10/22/2014 6:47:36 AM PDT by dfwgator (The "Fire Muschamp" tagline is back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson