That's a damn dirty lie — in 1992 Ross Perot got nearly 20% of the popular vote (Clinton got about 43 and bush about 38)… what did we see after that? The Democrat/Republican Uniparty closed ranks and passed legislation to create massive hurdles to third-party contenders. Why?
Because they
came close.
I refuse to vote against someone because of the false assertion that the other guy's worse
— we've seen that that's just an excuse to offer up more of the same
as the choice
.
Perot was nothing but a spoiler, an idiot option.
He got Clowntoon elected twice!
G H W Bush was a true RINO, but he was more conservative than Clowntoon.
The only sane option was to beat Bush in the primary, and if you can’t do that you hold your nose.
There were no ‘good’ choices in the 1992 or 1996 general election, only ‘least bad’.
If you want more conservative candidates, get them nominated in the primary! They always get my vote!