Hardly indifference. I wouldn’t take this article as a Guardian editorial view - there’s plenty of fairly straight Ebola coverage elsewhere in the Guardian. Jenkins is a contrarian, not easily classifiable. Sometimes he appears very left, sometimes the opposite.
Putting this stuff into print is a mistake.
Strong measures are called for, and here’s this guy acting as if the government is doing something it shouldn’t.
You could easily be right regarding the overall Guardian deliverance of information, but all this article is going to do is enable those who are trying to game the issue on race or unfairness.
So at least in part the Guardian is problematic here.