Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Circuit court rules illegal immigrants have a right to bail
The Washington Times ^ | October 15, 2014 | Stephen Dinan

Posted on 10/15/2014 7:22:07 PM PDT by jazusamo

Illegal immigrants have the same constitutional right to bail that U.S. citizens do, a federal appeals court ruled Wednesday in a decision striking down an Arizona statute designed to make sure criminals without any community ties didn’t flee in the face of a looming trial.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, in a 9-2 decision, ruled that Arizona’s voters, who passed the statute in a 2006 referendum, were actually trying to punish illegal immigrants rather than trying to reduce the risk of flight by those charged with serious felonies. The judges said bail isn’t allowed to be used as punishment, since the accused is innocent until proven guilty.

“Intentionally meting out pretrial punishment for charged but unproven crimes, or the nonexistent crime of being ‘in this country illegally,’ is without question, a violation of due process principles,” Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen wrote in a concurring opinion.

The case marks the latest time that the 9th Circuit, which covers most of the western U.S., has struck down one of Arizona’s get-tough immigration laws.

An earlier three-judge panel of the same court had upheld Arizona’s law, but Wednesday’s ruling supersedes that.

Immigrant rights advocates said the ruling shows that constitutional rights apply to everyone, regardless of their status.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: 9thcircuit; aliens; arizona; bail; criminals; illegals; immigrants
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: jazusamo

“Absolutely, anyone with an ounce of common sense knows this ruling by the 9th circus is an abomination.”

If true why won’t the House Republicans do their job and vote articles of impeachment on these judges?


21 posted on 10/15/2014 8:15:10 PM PDT by Soul of the South (Yesterday is gone. Today will be what we make of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The judge can give bail and ask them to turn their passports. :)

Seriously it is the judges discretion how much bail to request. I would imagine that an illegal would have trouble getting a bond.


22 posted on 10/15/2014 8:47:50 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (AGW-e is the climate "Domino Theory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mears; Alter Kaker; montag813

The ones who recognize American sovereignty. ..

Eregal M uhgrantz should not be bailed.

They are absolutely flight risks and have no permanent address, in the U.S.


23 posted on 10/15/2014 9:30:30 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: montag813
Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen Remember all those poor "boat people" we took in from Vietnam? There ya go!

Judge Nguyen's father was a major in the South Vietnamese Army who worked closely with the US military and the CIA. He escaped South Vietnam with his family in 1975. Presumably the alternative was choosing to stay behind and being executed by the Communists. I take it you're on the side of the Communists on this one?

24 posted on 10/15/2014 9:54:48 PM PDT by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Fine. Bail is set for $686 Trillion.


25 posted on 10/16/2014 2:42:10 AM PDT by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker
Judge Nguyen's father was a major in the South Vietnamese Army who worked closely with the US military and the CIA. He escaped South Vietnam with his family in 1975. Presumably the alternative was choosing to stay behind and being executed by the Communists. I take it you're on the side of the Communists on this one?

No, I am not. Why is she? I guess she learned nothing from his experience.

26 posted on 10/16/2014 10:33:29 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson