Did he really sue a homeowner for a tree that fell on him when it was hit by lightning? And if his career is fighting against lawsuit abuse, than I have to say this is a good ad. Sorry guys.
No one cares in Texas what Abortion Barbie has to say about anything.
Perhaps. I don’t know the facts of the case, but if the insurance company settled for millions, I would tend to believe there was some merit to his case, not merely lawsuit abuse. Otherwise one would think the insurer would have let the case go to trial or settled for a much lesser amount.
Hildy.....you would have done exactly what Abbott did. The tree that fell on him crippling him for life was on someone’s property. I am sure his lawyers advised him to sue the property owner, who was most likely covered by homeowner’s insurance. If you were suddenly paralysed for life...you would have done the same thing to cover your medical bills and all the after effects that follow!!!
And....Abbott is the Attorney General for the state of Texas...and, a darn good one. He always follows the letter of the law. I suggest you do some in-depth reaseach into the cases, that idiot Wendy davis cited in her ad...and you will come to conclusion that in everyone of them, Abbott defended the existing, standing law of Texas!!!
In closing...I predict that Abbott will politically slaughter Wendy Davis on November 4, 2014....winning election by a massive, 12 to 17% margin!!!
Indeed. But you are in the wrong place to expect intellectual consistency.
“Did he really sue a homeowner for a tree that fell on him when it was hit by lightning? And if his career is fighting against lawsuit abuse, than I have to say this is a good ad. Sorry guys.”
Troll!
Ignorant demonrat plant.
Maybe an Abortion Barbie supporter
Or just someone who is a fool.
In order to get the homeowner insurance to pay he had to sue the home owner. That is the way the game works.
It does not mean that there was any malice toward the homeowner.
First I’ve heard about lightning. Story is the tree was rotten and it was determined the home owner was liable. The homeowners insurance settled so evidently they thought the homeowner was liable too!!