Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gun-Rights Advocates Should Fear History of Second Amendment
The Daily Beast ^ | 12/18/12 | Jason DeCrow(?)

Posted on 10/11/2014 10:20:49 PM PDT by ForYourChildren

Think it’s one short sentence that gives everyone the right to bear arms? Think again. Saul Cornell unravels the tangled history of one of our most misunderstood Amendments.

On Sunday, New York Sen. Chuck Schumer went on CBS’s Face The Nation and argued that people who support gun control “have to admit that there is a Second Amendment right to bear arms”.

Schumer’s effort to reach out to the gun-rights community may be well-intentioned, but it is also deeply ironic. If the nation truly embraced the Second Amendment as it was originally written and understood, it would be the NRA’s worst nightmare.

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

It’s time for a history lesson about one of America’s most popular and least understood rights. It’s also long past time to expose the hollow, ignorant fawning over the Second Amendment by gun-rights advocates for what it is.

In contrast to the libertarian fantasies that drive the contemporary debate about firearms in America, the Founders understood that liberty without regulation leads not to freedom, but anarchy. They understood that an armed body of citizens easily becomes a mob. In other words, a bunch of guys grabbing their guns and waving a flag emblazoned with a rattlesnake is not a militia.

{excerpt}


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; guncontrol; secondamendment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: ForYourChildren

Whoever is responsible for this “analysis” needs a full-time personal grammarian.

Seriously.


41 posted on 10/12/2014 2:11:38 AM PDT by John Valentine (Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

>>Why liberals, especially liberal Blacks and Jews, can’t see this basic logic is surprising to me.<<

Because liberals don’t think; they feel.


42 posted on 10/12/2014 2:14:39 AM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners. And to the NSA trolls, FU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Yes, the Bill of Rights confers no rights on the People; the People already possessed these rights and others long before the Bill of Rights was even a gleam in anyone’s eye.

What the Bill of Rights does do is to prohibit the federal government from attempting to interfere with these rights in any way. That’s largely been forgotten since the idea has gradually passed from favor in the schools since the coming of the Progressive era a century ago.

No, European style, rights are seen as something bestowed on the lowly by the grace and good will of those on high.


43 posted on 10/12/2014 2:21:16 AM PDT by John Valentine (Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ansel12; Bobalu

It’s so brilliant and yet so obvious. I slap my forehead for never having seen it.


44 posted on 10/12/2014 2:23:42 AM PDT by TigersEye (ISIS is the tip of the spear. The spear is Islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

“A well-educated electorate being necessary to the preservation of a free society, the right of the people to read and compose books shall not be infringed”


45 posted on 10/12/2014 2:29:50 AM PDT by NY.SS-Bar9 (Those that vote for a living outnumber those that work for one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

How about this, I’ll give up my firearms as soon as we pry the pens from the cold dead fingers of the idiots who write this garbage.


46 posted on 10/12/2014 2:39:12 AM PDT by exnavy (Fish or cut bait ...Got ammo, Godspeed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

review article comments


47 posted on 10/12/2014 2:59:53 AM PDT by sauropod (Fat Bottomed Girl: "What difference, at this point, does it make?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren
It completely ignores the contemporary use and meaning of "well regulated militia to substitute the modern infatuation with government regulation of everything.
48 posted on 10/12/2014 3:02:29 AM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rashputin

Back in the 90s when the militia movement was in full swing, the local militia had a good share of black members. In fact, they were the trainers, the ones who showed those new to firearms how to shoot and how to strip. they acted as the Sergeants.


49 posted on 10/12/2014 3:07:17 AM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

Actually dribble and drivel are the same thing. Drivel is the older, more formal word.


50 posted on 10/12/2014 3:09:03 AM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

Excellent re-wording for the sake of analysis.


51 posted on 10/12/2014 3:11:41 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sauron

My talking point #4

The Constitution can be amended. If you feel strongly about eliminating gun ownership, I suggest you work with your legislators to pass a repeal amendment and submit it to the states for ratification.


52 posted on 10/12/2014 3:38:07 AM PDT by Soul of the South (Yesterday is gone. Today will be what we make of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: sauron
TALKING POINT #3: The Bill of Rights (first ten amendments) were numbered the way they are currently because that’s the order in which they were passed by the respective state legislatures. Tells ya somethin’, huh?

I don't believe this is correct. My understanding is that the order of the 17 proposed amendments from the House was retained when 12 passed the Senate (after, among other changes, the Senate put the Second Amendment in its final form), and that order was retained when 10 of the 12 were ratified. The Second Amendment was actually fifth on the original list, and three that came before it from the House didn't pass.

Note: Original wording from the House was, "A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the People, being the best security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed, but no one religiously scrupulous of bearing arms, shall be compelled to render military service in person."

If you have better information, please provide a reference.

53 posted on 10/12/2014 4:19:14 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

I don’t give a damn what the liberals use as an excuse to confiscate guns. The people of this country have spoken on the interpretation of the second amendment. But like every other right there are people who would give it up!!!


54 posted on 10/12/2014 4:29:02 AM PDT by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

Very good video on gun rights!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1u0Byq5Qis


55 posted on 10/12/2014 4:48:52 AM PDT by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

The author of this piece got nearly everything wrong. For example, no individual rights arguments on the 2A before 1981? I remember arguments on that point in the 60’s.


56 posted on 10/12/2014 5:30:21 AM PDT by Brooklyn Attitude (Things are only going to get worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

Pure bull manure.

If the 2nd Amendment only applies to regulating militias, then what does he make of Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution, which gives Congress the authority to organize, arm, train and discipline the militia?


57 posted on 10/12/2014 5:56:10 AM PDT by VOR78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VOR78

The Second Amendment refers to the armed, unorganized body of the people - a militia in plain usage meaning any one who can take up arms.

Article 1 Section 8 refers to the organized militia one created by Congress. Today called in the states the National Guard but which can be called forth by the federal government.

They are two different forms of militia. The Second Amendment would be redundant if the Founders had meant to set up only a state-organized militia.

Ask a liberal and hoplophobe to explain why two different kinds of militia are referenced in the Constitution.


58 posted on 10/12/2014 6:02:58 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Agreed. Even the modern version of the Militia Act includes two such classifications of ‘militia’.

But you’re absolutely correct. This liberal nitwit does not realize that the original Constitution already included the provisions he argues the 2nd was about, and therefore, his argument is redundant and irrelevant. 2A could only have been a protection of individual rights when placed in the context of the entire Constitution.

And I’d also like to see him explain the 1st set of militia acts, which required the members to supply their own weapons and ammunition.


59 posted on 10/12/2014 6:25:51 AM PDT by VOR78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice

“Stop talking about it, and come and take them.”

That’s the bottom line with the 2nd Ammendment. Gun control advocates just think that if they can get the Congress to pass a law forbidding gun ownership then that’s the end of it. They just pick up all the guns and its over.

So everyone needs to make sure these gun control nuts know that gun confiscation will never happen under any circumstances. No matter what law gets passed it does not trump the Constitution and we will just not give em up. Its not going to happen.


60 posted on 10/12/2014 6:29:58 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson