Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: notted

I think your idea is interesting. If a person can refuse to participate and can still vote, there goes your control. And privacy being whatever the government declare it to be, good luck forcing someone to participate in this if they don’t want to.

I hate to be Debbie Downer here, but it seems there would be problems. Then again perhaps the Supremes would agree with this. Heaven only know what their collective mind approves of one moment to the next these days.

Push on. See if you can develop some broad interest in it. In theory I have no problem with it. I think it could cut down on multiple votes. That’s a great goal.


63 posted on 10/10/2014 7:31:55 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Obama and the Left are maggots feeding off the flesh of the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne

LOL, and thanks. I’m not attempting to persuade anyone, so discouragement isn’t possible. Just running it up the flag pole, and I know that the possibilities of generating a discussion or sparking an idea with the people whom make these decisions, well, is unlikely.

And frankly, our country has some overwhelming problems, and we have a President, who acts, as if he is working for the enemy. IMHO.


66 posted on 10/10/2014 8:07:39 PM PDT by notted
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson