Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Satellite photos appear to show damage after “explosion” at suspected Iranian nuclear facility
Hotair ^ | 10/09/2014 | AllahPundit

Posted on 10/09/2014 9:29:07 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

If you read this post on Tuesday, you’ll want to read this one too. Did something happen a few days ago at the Parchin military base, where Iran has been accused of testing components for atomic bombs? Iranian state media reported that there was a fire at an “explosives producing facility” east of Tehran that killed two people; an Iranian dissident group countered that it wasn’t just any facility that had burned, it was an area on the Parchin base. And it wasn’t just a fire that had occurred, it was a gigantic explosion that shattered windows miles away. What’s the truth?

A site called Israel Defense obtained the most recent commercial satellite photos of Parchin and concluded, yep, something’s up. Quote:

Satellite images of the Parchin area, to the east of Tehran, prove: the explosion reported by the Iranian media had, indeed, occurred inside the military compound in Parchin, where, according to western intelligence agencies, trials are being conducted on nuclear missile fuzes. Satellite images obtained by Israel Defense and analyzed by specialist Ronen Solomon clearly show damage consistent with an attack against bunkers in a central locality within the military research complex at the Parchin military compound.

The locality in question is situated at the center of the compound, adjacent to another installation where, according to intelligence sources, the trials being conducted involve controlled detonation of fuzes intended to serve as triggers for nuclear devices. The locality consists of a sizable testing center and what appears to be an area with bunker-shaped structures.

I don’t want to reproduce the photos here since it’s their scoop, so follow the link and click the image at Israel Defense to see a large before-and-after comparison. There are indeed some buildings missing as well as signs of scorching in another area. There doesn’t seem to be much debris, which you would think would be clearly visible in the footprint of the buildings that have vanished, but there do appear to be large trucks on the scene. Maybe Iran ordered a hurried clean-up between the evening of October 5th, when the fire/explosion happened, and October 7th, when the latest satellite images were taken. Could the rubble from multiple buildings be cleared away that quickly?

Another western defense shop, the Institute for Science and International Security (a.k.a., er, ISIS), had the same idea as Israel Defense and looked at the latest satellite photos too. Their analysis is in PDF form but I highly recommend having a look, as the photos are not only helpfully marked but they include a wide shot of most of the base so that you can see where the attack site is vis-a-vis other key locations. Takeaway:

Several signatures that coincide with those expected from an explosion site are visible here. Two buildings that were present in August 2014 are no longer there, while a third building appears to be severely damaged. In total at least six buildings appear damaged or destroyed. Several trucks are present at the site. The shape and size of these trucks is consistent with those of either fire or debris removal trucks. The irregular line and color of the vegetation seems to indicate that some unexpected activity took place (possibly a fire, explosion, scattering of debris etc.). Finally, grey debris is visible at the center of the potential explosion area and is also scattered into the surrouding vegetation.

However, it is important to highlight that a section of the Parchin military complex was not analyzed by ISIS because it was missing from the most recent satellite imagery purchased from Airbus for unexplained reasons. This site is believed to house many buildings possibly dedicated to munition manufacturing, location where an explosion could potentially take place. Therefore, ISIS will be waiting for additional satellite imagery before reaching a final conclusion on the location of the blast.

In other words, they think they’ve found evidence of where a fire/explosion happened recently at Parchin, but since the most recent satellite photos don’t show the entire base, they can’t say if other parts of the base might have been damaged too. All of which seems straightforward — until you look at the first photo (Figure 1) in the ISIS PDF. It turns out the damaged site isn’t located in the parts of the base that have drawn the west’s nuclear suspicions. If this was an attack, in other words, why attack this location instead of the munitions areas or the suspected atomic-component testing areas? Two obvious possibilities. One: The attacker had reason to believe from its own intelligence that something important was going on in the targeted area, despite the fact that it hasn’t raised western suspicions before. Or two: There was no attacker and this really was some sort of accidental fire/explosion in a relatively innocuous part of Parchin.

I’ll leave you with one more thought, in case you’re inclined towards theory two. Judging by the damage, whatever happened doesn’t seem enormous enough to have shattered windows miles away. But if you look at the “after” photo of the damaged area in ISIS’s PDF, you’ll see that buildings damaged by the mystery event aren’t all adjacent to each other. There are some scorched buildings in the upper left corner of the photo, then a bunch of untouched buildings in the center, and then lots of damage on the right. How would a fire or accidental explosion skip over the buildings in the center? Seems like an attack that specifically targeted the damaged buildings is more likely.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iran; lebanon; nuclear; nukes; parchin; russia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: SeekAndFind

2 people killed? What do you think the chances are that the casulty list is far higher?


21 posted on 10/09/2014 9:59:23 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

RE: If the Israelis have found a way to cause damage like this without anyone being able to figure out how it happened...all I can say is, WOW!

It does not look like a bomb dropped from the air did it. Looks like a saboteur was able to sneak in and place a time bomb.

But how did he get in, and where is he now?


22 posted on 10/09/2014 10:04:10 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (If at first you don't succeed, put it out for beta test.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Iran seems to have the worst luck regarding their nuclear facilities. How many times have we read of explosions and fires at such facilities? They really need to be more careful.

Maybe they should put up more “danger!” signs and warning signs: “Do not cross red wire with blue wire!”

Goshdarnit.


23 posted on 10/09/2014 10:12:09 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Need more of those buildings and everything in and around them disappear!


24 posted on 10/09/2014 10:13:01 AM PDT by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangus

Cruise missiles? Israeli subs are armed with them.


25 posted on 10/09/2014 10:15:54 AM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Caution: No smoking in the ammo dump.


26 posted on 10/09/2014 10:19:31 AM PDT by rdl6989
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

My thought is Israel owns Iran’s industrial/military complex’s computer systems. I would also fathom a guess that unless Iran decides to kill every engineer on staff, they will never get rid of the Israeli presence.


27 posted on 10/09/2014 10:20:41 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Ebola: Satan's End Game for Humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

RE: My thought is Israel owns Iran’s industrial/military complex’s computer systems

You mean they can control them REMOTELY?


28 posted on 10/09/2014 10:24:08 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (If at first you don't succeed, put it out for beta test.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
You mean they can control them REMOTELY?

Yep. It's the Internet of Kosher Things.


29 posted on 10/09/2014 10:30:11 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic
2 people killed? What do you think the chances are that the casulty list is far higher?

The rest were vaporized. Doesn't count.

30 posted on 10/09/2014 10:34:18 AM PDT by McGruff (we're leaving behind a sovereign, stable and self-reliant Iraq - Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The Mossad is putting in work!!!


31 posted on 10/09/2014 10:37:23 AM PDT by mothball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Children playing with matches. Nuclear matches.


32 posted on 10/09/2014 10:38:46 AM PDT by TexasRepublic (Socialism is the gospel of envy and the religion of thieves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

I was thinking that it was initial explosion triggering other explosions... indicating that EVERYTHING was military.


33 posted on 10/09/2014 10:40:29 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: dangus

From the pictures that seems more likely.


34 posted on 10/09/2014 10:47:11 AM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“You mean they can control them REMOTELY?”

And LOCALLY.


35 posted on 10/09/2014 10:50:36 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Ebola: Satan's End Game for Humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

RE: And LOCALLY.

Well if true, the interesting question is ... WHO’s doing it?


36 posted on 10/09/2014 11:01:29 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (If at first you don't succeed, put it out for beta test.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Too much structure still standing in my books. The entire area should be demolished.


37 posted on 10/09/2014 11:40:36 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (Guns are like parachutes. If you need one and don't have one, you'll probably never need one again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’d like to see more accidental explosions....say from about 10,000 ft.!!!


38 posted on 10/09/2014 1:27:31 PM PDT by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

It’s guys like you who cause these accidents to happen.

>> Maybe they should put up more “danger!” signs and warning signs: “Do not cross red wire with blue wire!”<<

There is no blue wire. It’s green! “Do not cross red wire with green wire!”<<


39 posted on 10/09/2014 6:08:11 PM PDT by B4Ranch (Name your illness, do a Google & YouTube search with "hydrogen peroxide". Do it and be surprised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson