The legal basis of denial is too thin.
But, I am convinced it IS possible to propose and ratify a Constitutional Amendment via Article V and bypass even the cowardly Congress.
The fourteenth amendment is being violated by these courts.
Equal protection is not being applied to the voters who voted to keep marriage biblical OR to their representatives who passed such laws.
My guess: you won't get an Article V resolution through more than 10 legislatures at best.
It was noted yesterday by a guest on Fox that the SCOTUS will take another look when there is an appeals ruling in favor of keeping same sex marriage. There was such a possible verdict noted
It was noted yesterday by a guest on Fox that the SCOTUS will take another look when there is an appeals ruling in favor of keeping same sex marriage. There was such a possible verdict noted
Once the first gay coupled was legally married, it was a done deal. The fight for the First Amendment is the one we all need to wage now. Either we can speak freely or not. We can associate freely or not. We can run our churches freely or not.
I honestly don’t understand how ONE judge can overturn laws that have been passed by voting Americans and their state representatives. If the judge can do this, they can basically do anything. Can they enforce it? Hire only clerks that will uphold the voice of the people. What can they possibly do? Absolutely nothing. The legislation is clearly against the people for their own selfish desires, how much money have these judges received from rich queers? How much pressure has been applied? This is beyond ridiculous, and if a judge can do this and we let them get away with it then they can simply say we are nullifying second amendment rights, turn in your guns or you will be jailed. Resistance will be met with death. Yep, lets go get the legislators that allowed this to happen to get a bunch of states to ratify a constitutional amendment. Nope, nope, nope.