Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Responsibility2nd
How did I contradict myself when I said marriage belongs to the church and the government should recognize contracts?

When two people join in a union, it's essentially a binding contract. That's what the government should recognize.

Why is marriage a state and federal concern? Why does this issue take priority over all the other issues that the People are getting screwed on?
53 posted on 10/07/2014 9:03:53 AM PDT by randomhero97 ("First you want to kill me, now you want to kiss me. Blow!" - Ash)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: randomhero97

Because people decided the government should not be involved in marriage, we now have queer marriages and black robed thugs overturning state laws against queer marriages.

So you believe the citizens of a state shoud have the right to vote that queer marriages are illegal? I do. I suspect you do too.

But when you DENY the Federal government that same involvement you open the door for a bunch of black robed activists to overturn Constitutional Law.

Cruz is here proposing an Amendment protecting the States Rights. The 10th should be adequate enough, but clearly it isn’t. So what would you do? Besides sit back and watch Fedzilla enact a nationwide policy favoring queer marriage?


55 posted on 10/07/2014 9:13:11 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson