Sorry, but NEVER got into the full article.
I judged the entire article by the following:
“Did Thomas Eric Duncan know he might have possibly been exposed to Ebola in Liberia? Should he have been more aware of the potential dangers of Ebola and the potential for spreading the disease to others?”
Let’s see, Eric Duncan flew out of Monrovia, Liberia where Ebola has been running unchecked for how many weeks?
Let’s see, Eric Duncan had lived in Monrovia, Liberia where dead bodies of Ebola victims are routinely found on the city’s streets.
Lets see, Eric Duncan had physically carried a woman stricken with Ebola to and from a hospital’s maternity AND Ebola wards. She was refused admission to the Ebola ward because it was full.
From those three documented statements there is no doubt in my mind that Eric Duncan knew he was exposed to Ebola before he boarded the flight to Brussels. He also had, from personal observation, an idea as to serious an Ebola infection was and could be.
Why display your own stupidity and heard mentality by asking questions that have already been answered?
I don’t doubt that he understood it either. He wasn’t some primitive person, he was sophisticated enough to apply for a visa and get on a plane for the US. He worked for some shipping company when he had a job.
You should read the whole article. I’m sorry, but I had to severely snip it in order to follow the rules. Dr. Manny wrote a much better article than my synopsis reveals. His questions were numerous and made a lot of sense.
I thought the historic info on Typhoid Mary was more important which is why I abbreviated the questions about Duncan.