[OneWingedShark]

No, the math is not flawed.
It is a perfect model of your charge against me: that voting third-party in `12 was voting for Obama.

Now prove it.

[freedumb2003]

>>No, the math is not flawed.
It is a perfect model of your charge against me: that voting third-party in `12 was voting for Obama.
Now prove it.<<

Is your arithmetic that flawed? Any vote NOT for a candidate is a vote against him and FOR the opposite candidate.

Your non-vote (assuming you stayed at home in a hissy fit or voted 3rd party in a hissy fit) was a vote for obozo.

Simple math. You need me to “prove” arithmetic?

[freedumb2003]

>>Now prove it.<<

I did already.

2 candidates, 2 voters. 1 voter votes for candidate A. The second voter pitches a temper tantrum and doesn’t vote.

Candidate A wins.