Either that or be forced to resign.
If I assigned someone to protect me family and they failed, or if lapses occurred where a real threat came upon my family... of course I would fire them.
They have a job. Their resources are practically unlimited whereas they can hire the best of the best people in the nation and acquire the best technology available, some technology even classified that ‘does not exist’.... and STILL have something as simple as a lone man run through the front door.
Credit to Cummings for this line of questioning: “What is wrong with your culture that makes people speak as whistleblowers but won’t speak to management?”
It’s one thing to make a ‘mistake’ or your split second decision is the wrong one ... we’re all human. However, these guys failed at the most basic level ... did not even follow established protocols for protection of the WH. It’s rotten to the core. You need, as an example, an Allen West or Trey Gowdy type to straighten it out, not a Human Resources/bureaucrat, probably a diversity appointment (hate to say it, but that’s how this admin operates) spouting technical type jargon and not answering questions directly and trying to obfuscate. Bongino’s comments in #6 on this thread are spot on.
I think she was a "twofer"..female AND gay"..so Obama got his money's worth..
“Their resources are practically unlimited whereas they can hire the best of the best people in the nation and acquire the best technology available”
...yet their spokesdroid’s mouthpiece excuses them with “every organization has some learning to do” regarding a spectacular failure to stop the most mundane attacker.
If the one family home having the very best money-and-law-is-not-an-issue security on the planet can’t stop (multiple times over) this kind of problem, then in no way should said occupant & cronies be telling us to settle for nothing more than complete disarming and trusting security to people we’ve never met and are miles away.