Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I remember when they supported clean coal.

Then when it looked like they were going to get it, they opposed it.


2 posted on 09/27/2014 5:22:09 PM PDT by cripplecreek ("Moderates" are lying manipulative bottom feeding scum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cripplecreek

They have goalposts on wheels. We will never reach them.


8 posted on 09/27/2014 5:46:20 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s ((If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: cripplecreek

Are we depleted of anthracite, or are we just not bothering with obtaining that type of coal?


10 posted on 09/27/2014 5:52:19 PM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: cripplecreek

Maybe you can help me here. As I understand it, coal is not prohibited as such, they simply established emission standards that coal can’t meet.

Which means that if someone discovers a method whereby coal can be used and still meet those emission standards, it’s right back in the game, and the inventor will become very, very rich.

Depending of course on the cost of the method for burning coal at low emissions.

Or am I missing something?


11 posted on 09/27/2014 6:00:49 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (Perception wins most of the battles. Reality wins ALL the wars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson