The rhetoric has changed, it has gotten more shrill, and with totalitarian overtones overtly in the open instead of just in the white papers.
See #3.
To reduce their carbon footprint, are the participants all walking home after the summit?
So the question is - will they continue to “push through” with global warming as their excuse for totalitarianism,
or will they “pivot” to another route?
>> The rhetoric has changed, it has gotten more shrill
I, for one, had NO idea that it was such a serious problem until Jean Kerree told me I could expect four — FOUR! — degrees of warming in my probably lifetime!
And he’s in a position of authority that can’t be denied.
(Plus he went to Viet Nam.)