Does this make sense to anyone on any level, even a "poetic" one? 'Cause I don't see it.
And she would "support" her right to choose? How, exactly would she do that? God, I just ate breakfast, too. Brunch, I suppose.
Even for a screwed-up lefty murderer, it doesn’t make sense. It’s very easy to say “I would have supported her daughter’s choice” when she killed her before she could ever make a choice. How evil must someone be to admit that the person they were carrying was a person, to be the mother of that person, and to at least publicly, blithely say “I killed her because she would’ve interfered with my life”? Normal people wouldn’t kill a dog or cat for that reason, but she’s proud, this woman who would have been her daughter’s mother, that she killed her own daughter-her admitted daughter-for the mere sake of her own convenience.
That famous phrase about the banality of evil comes to mind.