Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats Are Poised To Hold The Senate, And It’s Conservative’s Fault
Townhall.com ^ | September 21, 2014 | Derek Hunter

Posted on 09/21/2014 4:48:33 AM PDT by Kaslin

I know a lot of people are giddy at the prospect of Republicans taking the Senate this November, but that’s becoming less and less likely. It’s not because Democrats are rallying around a particular mission or set of candidates; it’s because Republicans and conservatives aren’t.

It seems like I’m always writing on issues no one wants to hear are mistakes, such as messaging or social issues. But I don’t care. These things have to be said. If these columns are received like a gaseous cousin on a long car trip through the desert, so be it. Crack a window…

If things continue on their current course, the GOP will not retake the Senate. Anyone telling you differently is selling something.

There are many reasons for this: tough primary fights, the “establishment vs. Tea Party” meme, stubbornness, arrogance, ignorance, ego. You name it, a segment of the center-right coalition suffers from it.

Too many people and groups on the right are content to take their ball and go home because their candidate lost a primary and/or the nominee doesn’t pay enough attention to whatever pet issue they care about most. They may vote, but their email lists sit idle and their wallets remain closed.

GET OVER YOURSELVES!

As upset as you may be, this election is not about any of the candidates you dislike. This election is about the following things, and the following things only – Barack Obama, Harry Reid and the Supreme Court.

I don’t care where someone lives or who their Senate candidate is … if you don’t support the Republican candidate, for whatever reason, with everything you have, you are voting to retain Harry Reid as Senate Majority Leader.

In spite of what you may have heard, the Senate is very much in play and too close to call. As unpopular as Barack Obama is, that isn’t enough to win. You have to be involved – through donations, volunteering, talking to everyone you know – or else Democrats will win.

I’m not making this up, I’m not trying to scare you; these are real numbers in real races that will make the difference. And they don’t look good.

The next two years can be spent either forcing an unpopular president to veto popular, pro-growth, pro-liberty legislation, acts that will harm his party for years; or spent with an unfettered activist president complaining about a do-nothing Congress while he initiates executive actions to implement a radical agenda and worse – packing the Supreme Court.

Live in Kansas and think Pat Roberts is a squish? Tough! Suck it up and support him.

Live in Kentucky and think Mitch McConnell is awful? Get over it and support him.

Live in Iowa and not a particular fan of Joni Ernst? Grow up and support her come hell or high water.

Live in Colorado and don’t think Cory Gardner is for you? Who cares? Support him or you are supporting Harry Reid.

Live in Arkansas and wish Tom Cotton wasn’t the nominee? So what? He’s the nominee, support him or lose more than that one race.

It doesn’t matter where you live—Louisiana, Michigan, Alaska, West Virginia, North Carolina, Georgia, New Hampshire, anywhere—if you don’t suck it up, fight and work like your candidate won, you will be handing the Senate back to Harry Reid and the power to President Obama he has always sought – to fundamentally transform America.

It’s not the Senate that’s on the ballot this fall; it’s the Supreme Court.

In the last two years of his presidency, Barack Obama could appoint as many as three new justices to the Supreme Court. Would you like to see retiring justices replaced by young activist progressive nominees rubber-stamped by Harry Reid? Then work!

Yes, a Supreme Court nominee must overcome a filibuster according to Senate rules. But those are current rules and, as Harry Reid demonstrated for all other federal appointees, those rules can be changed at a moment’s notice and by a simple majority to fit whatever he and the president want at any time.

If you stay home, or if you simply vote and that’s it, you might as well be working for Harry Reid and Barack Obama. If the Supreme Court is lost, it will be lost for at least a generation. Then it won’t matter who you elect or who the next president is, the progressive agenda will be locked in as the law of the land for the foreseeable future.

You have a choice this fall: Sit on the bench or work to defeat whoever the Democrat is running for the Senate in your state. One choice is a vote for Harry Reid for Senate Majority Leader and more cover for President Obama’s abuses of power. The other will at a minimum apply pressure on the hemorrhaging wound from which our liberty is seeping.

The damage done to this country in recent years won’t be reversed by one election. No ship as big as the United States can be righted immediately. It will take time. But it can’t start being corrected until it stops getting worse. It can stop getting worse this fall if you vote and work to get others to do the same.

If you’re unhappy with your choices this fall, if your candidate didn’t win, you face a simple choice this November: Check your ego, pull your head out from where your hands are and get in the game. Or just quit. Which way are you going to go?


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2014election; 2016election; election2014; election2016; gop4alqaeda; gop4obama; gop4obamacare; gop4openborders; gop4polygamy; gop4rinos; gop4romneyagenda; gop4romneycare; harryreid; republicans; senate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440441-460461-480 ... 501-507 next last
To: perfect_rovian_storm

The last time that we had a situation like you describe was in the thirties when the New Deal was at its peak. The significant difference, of course, that the southern block of Democrats were almost all conservatives and they were able to block or damper some of the most outrageous progressive ideas.

If the Republican caucus were to shrink to less than 30 members, then they would have no influence on the floor and almost none at the committee level where seats are assigned in proportion to the size of the caucus. The political strength of any group is measured by the number of votes that they control. If you don’t have the votes, your voting block is impotent.


441 posted on 09/21/2014 6:14:08 PM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 418 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911
I'll have you know, YOU represent that remark.
442 posted on 09/21/2014 6:14:46 PM PDT by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 439 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911

This is Free Republic. It’s not the fellate the GOPe shill lounge. Fock off.


443 posted on 09/21/2014 6:16:40 PM PDT by VRWC For Truth (Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

!


444 posted on 09/21/2014 6:17:29 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass (The end move in political in always to pick up a weapon...eh? "Bathhouse" 0'Mullah? d8^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest
They're in a "group huddle", trying to come up with some (or maybe JUST ONE) facts so they don't look like they're totally "grade-school" level, and flunked "DEBATE CLASS" .

"Look, guys. Stop calling me tonight, OK? Call it a night. Forget...yes, but...shut up! OK, OK, OK! I'm hanging up now. " [hangs up on Freeper trolls] "Morons"


445 posted on 09/21/2014 6:18:16 PM PDT by COBOL2Java (I'm a Christian, pro-life, pro-gun, Reaganite. The GOP hates me. Why should I vote for them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 440 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java
These young whipper-snapper must not have to work much.
They really don't know HOW to debate, do they?
Have a good night.
Other tasks are calling me.
446 posted on 09/21/2014 6:20:39 PM PDT by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 437 | View Replies]

To: VRWC For Truth

FU assclown!
You don’t own this place or make the rules any more than I do. Just because your brilliant game plan is to sit on your fat ass until the GOPe comes around don’t get pissed when someone calls you the fool that you are.


447 posted on 09/21/2014 6:21:10 PM PDT by rodguy911 (FreeRepuplic:Land of the Free because of the Brave--Sarah Palin our secret weapon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 443 | View Replies]

So there is not ONE person on FR that can explain why Tillis is a bad pick for North Carolina?


448 posted on 09/21/2014 6:21:15 PM PDT by eyedigress (e(zOld storm chaser from the west)/?s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 430 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java
One more for documentation.


Why Did Conservatives Stay Home in '12 ?, March 15, 2013

449 posted on 09/21/2014 6:25:05 PM PDT by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 445 | View Replies]

Comment #450 Removed by Moderator

Comment #451 Removed by Moderator

To: Yosemitest

This article was written the day after the election without the final tallies and only shows that fewer whites vote in 2012. Is it your assertion that because the issing voters are white they had to be conservative? If so how did Romney (60, 933,500), receive almost a million more final votes than McCain (59,948,323), did?

It couldn’t possibly be that they were disenchanted Obama voters? 2008 (69,498,516) to 2012 (65,915,796).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_2008

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_2012


452 posted on 09/21/2014 6:36:46 PM PDT by yuleeyahoo (Liberty is not collective, it is personal. All liberty is individual liberty. - Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 431 | View Replies]

Comment #453 Removed by Moderator

Comment #454 Removed by Moderator

Comment #455 Removed by Moderator

Comment #456 Removed by Moderator

It appears that Rove and the GOPe will reap the whirlwind they have sown.


457 posted on 09/21/2014 7:07:17 PM PDT by Leto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 456 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

Nobody is talking about a caucus of less than 30 members.


458 posted on 09/21/2014 7:09:33 PM PDT by perfect_rovian_storm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 441 | View Replies]

To: yuleeyahoo

Obviously my “barking dog” rhetoric was dead-on. Explain to us the good conservative logic in re-electing nobama by you and your cohorts sitting out the 2012 vote.


459 posted on 09/21/2014 7:11:03 PM PDT by X-spurt (CRUZ missile - armed and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 432 | View Replies]

To: eyedigress

Nothing yet besides running a crappy campaign. He hasn’t had the chance to screw us over yet, but considering the cabal backing him, it’s very likely only a matter of time before he does.


460 posted on 09/21/2014 7:11:41 PM PDT by perfect_rovian_storm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 430 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440441-460461-480 ... 501-507 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson