Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/19/2014 7:09:21 AM PDT by redreno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: redreno

They gonna have a leash law for cows now?


2 posted on 09/19/2014 7:13:16 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Hey Obama: If Islamic State is not Islamic, then why did you give Osama Bin Laden a muslim funeral?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: redreno

blm plot after “obtaining” a Bundy branded moo?


3 posted on 09/19/2014 7:15:28 AM PDT by rktman ("The only thing dumber than a brood hen is a New York democrat." Mother Abagail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: redreno

Pretty much standard for the farmer to be responsible if someone hits a cow.


4 posted on 09/19/2014 7:19:26 AM PDT by cripplecreek ("Moderates" are lying manipulative bottom feeding scum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: redreno
Unless the law has changed since I was a pup, Bundy is right: maintenance of fences alongside Interstate Highways are the responsibility of the transportation department.

It would be a different story if the cows broke through a fence alongside some local road or farm road and thence wandered on to the Interstate.

The reason for the fence maintenance requirements date back to the Eisenhower administration when the interstate system was first authorized for national defense purposes. High speed highways and critters, whether local livestock or wildlife, present a potentially lethal hazard to travelers. The fence is the last line of defense.

Anyone who has driven through the more desolate parts of I-80 in Wyoming and Nebraska will notice fences along most of the entire length save for a few sections where the terrain makes the erection of a fence nearly impossible. These areas, where there is a risk for wildlife, are marked with warning signs about wildlife crossing.

9 posted on 09/19/2014 7:26:52 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: redreno
Bundy might have a point, assuming he wasn't negligent:

NRS 568.355  “Open range” defined.  As used in NRS 568.360 and 568.370, unless the context otherwise requires, “open range” means all unenclosed land outside of cities and towns upon which cattle, sheep or other domestic animals by custom, license, lease or permit are grazed or permitted to roam. (Added to NRS by 1983, 235)

NRS 568.360  Duties of owners of domestic animals with respect to domestic animals upon highway.
1.  No person, firm or corporation owning, controlling or in possession of any domestic animal running on open range has the duty to keep the animal off any highway traversing or located on the open range, and no such person, firm or corporation is liable for damages to any property or for injury to any person caused by any collision between a motor vehicle and the animal occurring on such a highway.
2.  Any person, firm or corporation negligently allowing a domestic animal to enter within a fenced right-of-way of a highway is liable for damages caused by a collision between a motor vehicle and the animal occurring on the highway.(Added to NRS by 1965, 644; A 1983, 235)

11 posted on 09/19/2014 7:28:19 AM PDT by caligatrux (...some animals are more equal than others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: redreno

Take-Home Road kill is compensation to suffice the claim.

From the tort:

“You break it, you buy it”


14 posted on 09/19/2014 7:34:23 AM PDT by bunkerhill7 ("The Second Amendment has no limits on firepower"-NY State Senator Kathleen A. Marchione.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: redreno
officials are refuting

That would be "disputing," right?

That is, if the reporter (or his editor) were, you know, objective—as opposed to a herd animal that has gotten the message that the Authorities must not be questioned by their subjects.

15 posted on 09/19/2014 7:36:30 AM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: redreno
... when her car hit one of the rancher’s cows on I-15 about 10 miles from his Bunkerville ranch.

The April 14 crash came two days after Bundy and his armed supporters made national news by forcing federal authorities to abruptly abandon an impound operation on public land...

Outside of some pretty clear precedent on open range law, how do they know it was Bundy who was negligent? Given the timing of all of this, it could very easily have been the BLM who was negligent with his cattle.

17 posted on 09/19/2014 7:42:17 AM PDT by pgyanke (Republicans get in trouble when not living up to their principles. Democrats... when they do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: redreno
The collision with the cow sent Danielle Beck and her boyfriend, Matthew Zanatta, to the hospital.

Probably didn't do much for the cow, either.

30 posted on 09/19/2014 8:55:23 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson