Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: redreno
Unless the law has changed since I was a pup, Bundy is right: maintenance of fences alongside Interstate Highways are the responsibility of the transportation department.

It would be a different story if the cows broke through a fence alongside some local road or farm road and thence wandered on to the Interstate.

The reason for the fence maintenance requirements date back to the Eisenhower administration when the interstate system was first authorized for national defense purposes. High speed highways and critters, whether local livestock or wildlife, present a potentially lethal hazard to travelers. The fence is the last line of defense.

Anyone who has driven through the more desolate parts of I-80 in Wyoming and Nebraska will notice fences along most of the entire length save for a few sections where the terrain makes the erection of a fence nearly impossible. These areas, where there is a risk for wildlife, are marked with warning signs about wildlife crossing.

9 posted on 09/19/2014 7:26:52 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Vigilanteman

I live within 1 mile of US Hwy 95-A, which is in N Nevada. There are Open Range signs all along it.

Cattle aren’t the main problem here-—Wild Horses are.

Too many city people moving into this area & they just don’t get it.


27 posted on 09/19/2014 8:44:48 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson