Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Timber Rattler

What combat leader would not want to replace his man warriors with a shorter, lighter, weaker, sicklier, less aggressive, slower moving, more terrain limited, reduced distance traveling, hygienically vulnerable, smaller weight carrying, more prone to injury, version?


11 posted on 09/17/2014 1:01:24 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12
I don't think women should have to be in combat...

that being said, women generally are in better health, live longer, have more stamina, can exist on less food, and obey orders better than men....so there....

hygenically vulnerable?....what does that mean?...they use toliet paper?...do they scratch their private parts?...pick their nose?...oh, you probably mean they have their monthlies once a month....

the world would completely stop if women decided to take it easy during their monthlies....which they don't.

29 posted on 09/17/2014 2:06:40 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: ansel12

all but sicklier. Never had cramps, rarely get sick.


47 posted on 09/17/2014 3:00:23 PM PDT by huldah1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson