Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12
I don't think women should have to be in combat...

that being said, women generally are in better health, live longer, have more stamina, can exist on less food, and obey orders better than men....so there....

hygenically vulnerable?....what does that mean?...they use toliet paper?...do they scratch their private parts?...pick their nose?...oh, you probably mean they have their monthlies once a month....

the world would completely stop if women decided to take it easy during their monthlies....which they don't.

29 posted on 09/17/2014 2:06:40 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: cherry

LOL, what a crock.

Women break down under the hard physical stress of soldiering, their injury rate is higher, they suffer from bad hygiene and they can’t keep up, they are losers in the military because of their injury rate, pregnancy, and low reenlistment rates.

You are correct about them being easier to lead though, and many writers have written about that corrosive effect they have, as weak leaders come to prefer the less effective, but less challenging females to hide their leadership deficiencies.

You don’t know about hygiene in the military? Have you been in, or do you read military history, for instance living in trenches and mud holes for weeks at a time?

Women are a real problem in the military, they can’t even do support jobs well, for instance changing the heavy tire on the truck they are driving, or lifting armament, or gear, they can’t even carry the needed gear for their own packs and set up large tents, and get over walls.


38 posted on 09/17/2014 2:15:58 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson