By personal insults, you get no where with me. Casey Anthony, stupidity, silly specimen - really, are you an amateur historian or just another person who resorts to insults when disagreed with?
The question is not why Richard didn’t produce the children - they were seen at Gipping Hall with their mother after his ascension to the throne - it’s why he didn’t produce their dead bodies. That was the typical behavior of usurpers. Richard himself was put on display in Leicester after his death to show that he was really, truly dead. Richard could very well have produced dead children - dead of pneumonia or any childhood disease. It didn’t happen.
Please stop the insults. I have not insulted you during this entire discussion. I like writing about this subject and find it depressing that you have to resort to such tactics to prove your points.
They were murdered within one month of his [pretended] ascension. They have been missing for over five hundred years, of which two encompassed his [pretended] reign. Your claim that he would have produced dead bodies if he was guilty is so nonsensical as to be unworthy of comment.