Posted on 09/16/2014 4:54:40 PM PDT by Olog-hai
The dark side of the campaign for Scottish independence can be laid bare today.
In a string of sinister incidents, separatists have used bullying and intimidation to cow their rivals.
Pro-union voters have endured stone-throwing, been called traitors and faced threats that their houses will be torched.
Many are now said to be too scared to show their support for fear of reprisals that might follow a defeat for the nationalists in tomorrows vote.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Trying hard to understand why anyone here cares what kind of government Scotland has unless they’re turning into a caliphate.
So we should not care if that government is socialist? That’s not too far from a caliphate for all intents and purposes.
You can care all you want which european governments are socialist and which aren’t. Seems like the flight has already left.
If you’re looking for more capitalism and less socialism you won’t find in in the UK or Scotland. In fact I know a nearby country which needs some work.
The biggest problem in the UK is that they are being overrun by sharia and they don’t fight back.
No, he isn’t.
I am telling you as a Scot, that there has been a growing problem here with intimidation and violence by elements of the YES campaign. So much so its hit the headlines, frontpage. I have actually seen it first hand.
See my reply to Darksheare.
p.s a ‘free’ Scotland would still keep the monarchy, which btw ARE Scottish.
Okers.
And whose economy did Salmond and the SNP/YES want to base our ‘free’ economy on?. Oh, and also Iceland. And Norway (whose economy is now beginning to tank, theres a great recent Reuters article on it). I am amazed Fat Eck didn’t argue for Zimbabwe while he was at it.
Our economy would be based on two failed economies and a failing third. You couldn’t make this stuff up. And a majority of Scots might vote for this?. Dear god.
So you would rather have Scotland told what to do by Londonstain than the Scottish population? The 98 per cent white population coming under sharia law according to the experts. I will take socialism over sharia law.
Quisling you are back! Lots of no posters going up in the Grassmarket is there?
You’re calling Westminster “Londonistan”? I don’t recall Cameron having formally adopted Sharia law or insist that it be imposed upon Scotlandnot without consideration of Cameron’s other quite serious foibles and gaffes.
The socialists will bring more Islam into an independent Scotland, not less. If you think you can vote them out should Scotland strike out on its own, think again; and remember socialists are false nationalists. You’ve got people like Kim Jong-un cheering for the Yes vote, remember.
The only reason that’s happening is due to the socialists catering to them. The more divided the UK gets, the more the islamofascists will get their hooks in.
The importance of pointing out the socialists is that they are the allies of the sharia subculture, via Islamic socialism, which is part of their “internationalist” movement.
Sorry Londonstain is what the posters on here call it. You know where the Uk is under the mooslimbs, Jews fear to tread, sharia courts all over the country. Cameron is a twat, a posh boy twat that has never had a proper job in his life. Not just him has any leader of the No campaign actually worked at a real job? All professional politicians, university then politics, twats the lot of them.
On the opposite tack, which of the socialists on the so-called “yes” side have ever held a “real job”? They would not be socialists if so. They are the harder form of Cameron; consider yourself warned. At least you’d be able to get Cameron out of Westminster by staying in; you’d be doing England and Wales (and Cornwall too) a huge favor.
The term “Edinburghistan” has already been coined. Why do you fail to condemn socialism, in any form it comes in (save “Londonistan”)?
Really Edinburghistan? Can you tell me what the Muslim population of Edinburghistan is?
Yes, really Edinburghistan. The Central Mosque seems to wield an outsized influence.
Muslims in England and Wales are about 9 percent of the population between the two; in London it is 12.8 percent. That ought not be anywhere near enough to wield significant influence, but they do so via the collusion of the leftists. Same thing will happen if the SNP gets a whole country to play with.
Answer the question. What is the Muslim population of Edinburghistan? Here is another what is the Muslim population of Scotland?
Not relevant. The population level of Muslims is not related to their ability to cause problems, as evidenced by England. They have a bigger leg to stand on when they have the aid of socialist allies.
Remember Bashir Ahmad of the SNP? or his movement, “Asian Scots for Independence”?
FWICS, Glasgow’s percentage of Pakistanis is higher than that of London.
Yes, really Edinburghistan. The Central Mosque seems to wield an outsized influence.
Not relevant. The population level of Muslims is not related to their ability to cause problems, as evidenced by England. They have a bigger leg to stand on when they have the aid of socialist allies.
Your words. Have you ever been to the Central Mosque? They do a great curry.
Ever been To Edinburgh? Ever been to Scotland? I’m still waiting on your figures for the Muslim population.
Thanks for revealing what side you’re on.
The side of self determination for the Scottish people.
Are you going to answer the question? Can you handle the truth?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.