Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sherman Logan

Everyone is using term ISIS. The question is why Obama persists in using ISIL. He is odd man out. We know the answer - his failure in Iraq and Syria.


6 posted on 09/12/2014 10:50:03 AM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: plain talk

He has not yet failed in Iraq and Syria. ISIS is not yet defeated.


18 posted on 09/12/2014 11:34:04 AM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson ONLINE http://steshaw.org/economics-in-one-lesson/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: plain talk

That could be it, but I think Obama says “ISIL” out of sheer arrogance. Saying ISIL instead of ISIS like everyone else makes him feel superior to his American subjects. This is just part of his ego-driven personality, such as when Obama insists on pronouncing Pakistan as “POKistan”.


22 posted on 09/12/2014 11:58:53 AM PDT by Fletcher J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: plain talk
the question is why Obama persists in using ISIL

Because he recognizes that the maniacs have what they perceive as claims on Jordan, Israel, Palestine and Lebanon. Sane people realize that even if such claims exist they have no validity whatsoever.

Their only valid claim to Syria and Iraq is that US policy created their existence and growth in those two countries. Is Obama implying he'd like to contribute to their growth in those other countries?

I would like to call ISIS disintegrated, but our disgusting government (and everyone elses) won't get together and kill the cancer instead of letting it spread.

28 posted on 09/12/2014 12:57:17 PM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson