Posted on 09/11/2014 7:57:29 AM PDT by Kaslin
My take on the president's remarks addressing the ISIS threat, a primetime do-over of his "no strategy" gaffe:
(1) President Obama is right to identify ISIS as a brutal and dangerous terrorist fighting force that threatens the region, the West, and the United States. He is right to ramp up our efforts to "degrade and ultimately destroy" this group. They are evil, fanatical butchers who only understand force, and must be stopped. Obama asserted that ISIS is neither Islamic nor a state -- but they absolutely act in the name of Islam (as do many terrorist groups), and their goal is to establish and expand an Islamist state, known as a caliphate. They've been frighteningly successful to that end, seizing vast stretches of land and major cities in Syria and Iraq, and amassing more money and resources than any terrorist organization on earth:
(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...
Why did he try to separate the terrorist ordinations! they all have the same goals! Islam is Islam Skippy! And make it clear all have to be vaporized!
Well that spell ck went awry! oops!
Arming anti-Assad “rebels” inside Syria to ostensibly fight ISIS is conflicted strategy.
What is happening is that 0bama is still at war with Assad. He isn’t giving up on that idea. Arming and training the anti-Assad rebels to “fight ISIS” is merely convenient to 0bama’s goal of fighting Assad.
...and there has been no debate in Congress about declaring war against Assad.
Furthermore, the anti-Assad “rebels” want to fight Assad, not ISIS.
0bama is going forward with *two* new wars: 1 against ISIS in Iraq and Syria, the second against Assad in Syria.
Syria is a 3 way war: Assad vs 0bama vs ISIS vs 0bama.
Yes we should be supporting Assad,as well as Mubarack and quadaffi,oh yeah,I forgot those guys are gone to,thanks to Obama and Hillary.
Gee you might think Hillary and Obama are supporting the Muslim brotherhood and their allies in the creation of that Caliphate,oh boy of course the President of The United States a traitor! NEVER!
The violent part of Islam is the part that must destroy the 75% of surplus men who can't have a wife, children, or a life... Muslim incentives create a need for permanent war.
Mohammad devised a self correcting system... down to rules on killing 'the enemy' and being allowed to rape captured wives and children. Mohammad knew foreign groups would step-in and kill Islams 'surplus' men. Do the 'dirty work' for Islam. It's an evil system - and all of it is Islamic. The sweet part, the not so sweet, and the evil... all part of one system.
ISIS and the harem - two sides of the same coin.
The ‘happy’ part of Islam is where each man can have four wives.
The violent part of Islam is the part that must destroy the 75% of surplus men who can’t have a wife, children, or a life...
Muslim incentives create a need for permanent war.
Mohammad devised a self correcting system... down to rules on killing ‘the enemy’ and being allowed to rape captured wives and children. Mohammad knew foreign groups would step-in and kill Islams ‘surplus’ men. Do the ‘dirty work’ for Islam. It’s an evil system - and all of it is Islamic. The sweet part, the not so sweet, and the evil... all part of one system.
ISIS is one side of the coin.
The islamic State is a State—it has territory, a government, resources, an army. Its just not recognized my many now—But then the United Colonies were not recognized in 1776.
I figure it's done because they hate Christians and want to protect radical muslims.
But it’s not Islam. Obama said so.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.