Posted on 09/08/2014 6:22:35 AM PDT by rktman
At the U.N. climate gabfest in Doha, exactly 21 months ago, world “leaders” decided they would extend the failed Kyoto Protocol from 2012 to 2020, with nations outbidding each other in their commitments to shut down their economies for no good reason at all. Technically, the Protocol had already lapsed, but world “leaders” do not pay much attention to the law.
However, a show of hands at the lamentably disorganized Doha climate yadayadathon was not enough. Individual nations were required, under the usual rules for treaties, to lodge an instrument of accession to the amendment with the U.N. as the depositary. So far, of 144 nations bound by the Kyoto Protocol, only 11 – or 7.5 percent – have indicated that they will sign.
The United States had the good sense not to sign up to the Kyoto Protocol in the first place. The U.S. Senate in 1997 voted by 95 to not accept any such protocol unless it bound all nations. The president of the Senate at that time was one Albert Arnold Gore.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
If a statistician plotted climate consensus over time, it would resemble an inverted hockey stick.
Rut Roh. Now you’re gonna get mikey mann all upset. I checked with my yard plants and they have formed a consensus that more SEE-UH-O-2 is a good thing for them and us.
Why? To save the planet of course. Cut down on those Green House Gases. Bad science makes bad politics makes bad products.
I bought a Speed Queen. The last of the American made washing machines. Add more water if you want. Run at maximum heat if you want. New rules in 2015 may make this washer the last of it's kind. Sad to say.
I’ve noticed the “scientist’s consensus” that global warming is manmade and bad keeps going up. First it was 97% (skewed, because answering yes to any question counted as yes for all). Then 98%. Then 99%.
Now there’s a paper that says we have darn near 100%.
New Research Reveals 99.999% Certainty Humans Are Driving Global Warming
http://www.fromquarkstoquasars.com/new-research-reveals-99-999-certainty-humans-are-driving-global-warming/
Maybe it was phrased like: “100% of scientist that agree glow-bull warming is caused my humans, agree that we are the cause.” I saw that one 99.999% thing the other day and almost blew coffee all over the keyboard. They are SOOOOOO smart that they “know” we are SOOOOOO stupid. Uh, no.
Research Reveals 99.999% Certainty
(Near-100+Near-0)/2) = 50
Sounds like the actual Glowbull Warming consensus is headed to its more historic (ie, since Glowbull Cooling) norms of 50%.
YEP, and A$$hole Gore and his followers just keep milking the whole scam for more money, Which is what it was all about in the first place.
Its never been about Climate Control but hidden it Population control from the Rockefeller Foundation in the 1930’s.
All this proves, in the liberal mindset,
is that they are smarter than 92.5% of the rest of the population.
The problem too with these enviro mentals is that they play a shell game.
All their “fixing” something to reduce “damage” to the earth is shifting 1problem to another aspect.
You are aware that all these clothes are now almost all cold wash, right? Yes, so we don’t use electricity to heat up water!
Now we need detergents that will clean better. What happens to those soaps?
These people are nothing but fascist jackasses. And it’s all a shifting game. The only way any of this works for “the sainted earth” is if we go to the stone age and do not try to make up for any deficiencies caused by these whackos.
Just be dirty, then the world will be clean!
This is true. Some if not most of the current machines will not allow you to add hot water. It has to be hot plus cold with the mix or temperature decided in Washington D.C. by some idiot.
That was one of the main reasons why we picked the Speed Queen. You can choose hot water right from your tank if you like. And of course we do.
Ping
I don’t know what you are talking about. The very first washer I just went looking for was a Kenmore, which allows a hot wash with hot water from your hot water line, AND has an additional heating element which allows it to heat the hot water even hotter. It is energy star compliant. Based on that and my experience hot water washers are readily available.
That said, unless you are a ditch digger, logger or such which regularly gets heavily soiled clothes. Hot water is usually unnecessary, and wasteful. Hot water does have some cleaning advantages, but it has some disadvantages as well.
http://www.ehow.com/info_8510687_cold-hot-water-laundry-washing.html
This simple answer is probably best “cold water is sufficient to clean sweat, skin cells, oil and odors from clothes, and is preferred for washing colors and blood stains. but for really dirty clothes, especially if there is poop or barf, you should wash in hot water.” From https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090205171411AA4XO9Y
A college statistics professor of mine said that when you add more variables, uncertainty ALWAYS goes up.
And that many people wish the next invention was a way to suck up that variability around which you must plan.
By her hypothesis alone, adding more variables for winds at different layers of the atmosphere, clouds, deep ocean temperatures, deep see currents and so forth means more uncertainty - not less.
And we all have a sure sign that the sun causes global warming each morning, when the coldest part of the night begins to warm with the sun’s rays and is hottest toward the end of the day when it has had the longest sun exposure.
Really? Quit spreading rumors about the sun being behind warming. LOL! :>}
That’s the simplest answer I gave my elementary aged child when he asked for me to explain it and what caused it.
He was only disappointed that all the horror movie stuff isn’t going to happen. Flooding, earthquakes, wars, horrors - it all looks cool at 8.
The child abuse is making the middle schoolers on up all think the world is going to end before they grow up, their parents and grandparents are to blame, and we all ought to drop dead now to avoid the horrors ahead.
It is even its own genre Cli-Fi, or climate fiction, an endless set of horror books about every disaster amplified to “2012” movie proportions, blamed on climate change. Of course, it is all young adult fiction and given to the 12 year olds alongside “The Giver”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.