Posted on 09/06/2014 11:56:53 AM PDT by JCG
Black youths beat a young couple walking in Springfield, Missouri on August 22,2014.
The mob ran up behind the couple as they left a bar in the city. The woman was also hit and knocked down in the assault.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
The DOJ will be investigating this as a Federal hate crime.........yeah, right.
If this guy had had a gun he and the woman would most likely have been killed with it. Swarms of attackers are impossible to defend against by one person.
Random acts of mindless... It’s clobberin’ time.
Sacramento Bee Photographer Is Severely Beaten - Los ... articles.latimes.com/1997-03-26/news/mn-42297_1_sacramento-bee Mar 26, 1997 - John Trotter, 36, a photographer for the Sacramento Bee, had been ... the attack and may be of little help in identifying his assailants, the Bee reported Monday.
IIRC it was known that blacks objected to the white guy taking pictures in their neighborhood. The Bee refused for a very long time to mention race but finally had to when two years later some were convicted of the crime.
These are cases where the MSM attempt to cover-up the racial aspect of black-on-white violence.
The vast majority of the time the victims are not connected to the MSM and are free to identify the race of the offenders. The MSM of course refuse to mention race much of the time.
Except of course very often the MSM headline white-on-black crime. (Man bites dog?)
and the influence of '60s Marxist-Alinsky campus radical, psycho spoiled brats had on 'em.
Where is the KKK now that we need them?
"We" don't need the KKK.
The Federal Government does and will continue to do everything possible to suppress such groups for as long as it can muster the forces to do so.
Black criminals are not a threat to the Government. They provide convenient reasons to justify expanded State controls over all citizens. At least that works until the criminal groups burst out of control.
White Militias, organized for any defensive purpose are definitely a threat to the present Government. Who needs more police and State controls when citizens can defend themselves without them?
“Black criminals are not a threat to the government.”
Neither are white criminals. Criminal auxiliaries... paramilitaries that are more criminal than political in nature... are often used by totalitarian governments as a means of control.
And, defensive militias, white or otherwise, are indeed a threat to government aims. We are in agreement.
I do remember the Guardian Angels. It was a great idea that fizzled over time.
Just some of Obama’s sons on the way to the golf course when this rude couple bumped into them.
Real honest law-abiding people have real jobs, families, friends, church, hobbies, and civic organizations to attend to. It’s hard to ask more time of them, especially when they are taxed to death and already paying for “safety” services. The layabout wastrel “yutes” don’t have any such demands on their time — they have every minute of every day to lay waste to civilized society after picking up their EBTs and “bama phones”. So such groups as Guardian Angels are destined to fail.
This attack happened in BALD KNOBBER country. No KKK needed.
http://www.legendsofamerica.com/mo-baldknobber.html
One shot and they would have scattered like pigeons in the park. Regardless, I 'd rather take my chances with a gun than without.
----
Send treats to the troops...
Great because you did it.
www.AnySoldier.com
(An entirely free service)
It is a miracle that the rule of law can ever get re-established once it breaks down. It usually takes the passing of an entire generation of gang leaders before that can happen - as noted in your link to the "Bald Knobbers".
"Rule-of-law" is fading quickly in the current times, due in large part to the inclinations of our "political elites". They do not want to be restrained in their desires by mere rules.
Once the rules are cut down, a cold wind blows across the land, and there is no shelter to be found.
We are in for some very nasty weather.
That’s a different case... I’ll see if I can find the one I’m talking about.
“If this guy had had a gun he and the woman would most likely have been killed with it. Swarms of attackers are impossible to defend against by one person.”
That’s pure BS
The thugs are all cowards who need a gang to act brave.
One shot at them or even into the air, and they take off.
BTW, my cc instructor sayids to never fire into the air as a warning.
Go for the largest body mass you can hit.
What you say about time is true. However, when the streets become too dangerous for the honest law-abiding people to go about their normal lives, there will have to be changes. The first change would be that they will be afraid to conduct their normal routines—their quality of life and the overall economy will suffer.
Once they can no longer count on the presumption of a society that is largely safe and cooperative, they will find ways to adjust.
The Guardian Angels were novel and way ahead of their time. Curtis Sliwa eventually became a celebrity. The Angels were restricted in the amount of force they could use, and their numbers were too few for them to be effective.
Exactly when during the attack did the guy have time to get his gun out and use it? Cite the exact second in the video.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.