Posted on 09/05/2014 7:10:58 PM PDT by LeoWindhorse
The one with the big glasses?
Yeah. Pajama boy’s twin sister.
You have some good ideas.
I am reminded of the comment that by the time the candidate ascends to the office of POTUS he no longer is worthy of the position. Wayy too much corruption....not sure how we get away from that. Sarah would most likely have done a good job of getting rid of as much of this as possible (based on her history in Alaska) and I believe THEY knew it so they let loose the screaming jackals on her and destroyed her. They’ll do the same to anyone who tries to clean up their gravy train.
I agree entirely. I also wonder when we cross the line to the point at which the corruption, elitism, and indefensibility of the political class leads to such disillusionment in the people that the numbers and the will of those who would lay down their lives on the battlefield to preserve our nation dwindles to the point that we can no longer defend ourselves.
Yup, Trey is the real deal.
He’s got his hands full with this one,, but I think he’s up to the task. His track record is pretty good.
You’ve pressed me several times to name names. Until I have the evidence - and/or it’s the right time to present the evidence - I’ll just remind everyone that we know the regime pays disinformation agents to pose as conservatives on social media; they can observe and make their own conclusions.
What have I said that leads you to believe I think you’re a paid disinformation agent?
Jarrett’s idea....or the MB agents in the WH, for the purpose of a repeat of the Blind Sheikh’s role as inspiration for other terrorist acts.
Please, don't play that coy crap with me.
Besides, Soros ain't paying me to debate minutia with you.
Well... technically he is, but still.. I'm not looking for extra responsibilities without I get a raise.
Just sayin'...
There’s not a coy bone in my body. It was an honest question. Why do you think I’ve pegged you as a paid operative?
I’ve never known you to debate anyone or anything. Pretty much I’ve only heard you use the buzzwords: crazy conspiracy crap stupid blogs take your garbage elsewhere etc
You do acknowledge that the regime uses paid operatives on the web, don’t you? And as a conservative, you want everybody to be aware of that so they don’t get deceived, don’t you? What general guidelines do you follow, for recognizing one of Obama’s operatives who is trying to control the dialog? How would you know it when you saw it?
If you’ve watched my conversations, you’ve seen that disagreeing with me is NOT what raises my suspicions about a person. Lots of people have disagreed with me on lots of things and I’ve said nothing about them being paid operatives. In fact, I think I’ve only mentioned any suspicions about a couple people, and it was because of their refusal to engage with information besides the same disproven stuff they spout over and over again - which is one of the indicators that something is not right with a person. Could be sheer stupidity, could be stubbornness, could be they’re paid to act stupid. If it’s combined with troll-type behavior, I tend to suspect the latter explanation. If all I ever see from them is troll behavior, I make a mental note of that as well.
And I hope others do the same, because the regime has its moles and trolls all over the place, trying to make things appear the opposite of what they really are. We’ve had tons of people zotted for acting like trolls here on FR. They’re not that hard to recognize; some people can recognize them almost instantly just by their behavior. Moles are the more dangerous people, because they’ve been more effective with their camouflage. The person eventually shown to be a mole will ALWAYS come as an utter shock to everyone, because their job was to have a good cover, and if they’ve lasted long then their cover is very good indeed.
But they’ll still be doing stuff that the regime wants done. Subversion.
I agree with what both of you have said and share those concerns. The corruption is destroying this nation, and until the politicians are afraid of how we can hold them accountable, the corruption will only get worse. If it can get worse than it already is...
Why wouldn't I?
I’ve never known you to debate anyone or anything.
First I'd tell you that your research, if any, is at fault.
Then I'd tell you that convincing anyone of anything is really low on my priority list.
I rarely get wound up enough about other folks' opinions to try to change 'em.
You do acknowledge that the regime uses paid operatives on the web, don’t you?
See, here's where you start asking "clever" questions in order to, I guess, trick me into some sort of admission.
I may agree 100% but I'm not being led about by questions from you.
you want everybody to be aware of that so they don’t get deceived, don’t you?
Same, see above.
I think I’ve only mentioned any suspicions about a couple people
Name some names.
And I hope others do the same, because the regime has its moles and trolls all over the place, trying to make things appear the opposite of what they really are.
Yes, clearly. I'm the worst of the lot.
because their job was to have a good cover, and if they’ve lasted long then their cover is very good indeed.
Yes, thanks. I've worked hard toward that end.
Seven quotes with refutation, that's $42.00 Mister Soros.
I know, they're dangerous as hell.
Easy to spot, though.. because they disagree with you.
I'm tired of the game, the subterfuge, the false flags and the fakery.
I'm ready to come clean, your clever questions have convinced me.
I'll tell you true, I happened to run into that Jim Thompson guy
who is said to run this place.. and true story I was tired and
had a couple beers in me. I flat out told him that I was a deep
cover troll and that I'd been frontin' for thirteen years. Yes,
the checks from Soros are nice and the parties in DC are freakin'
awesome but the torment in my soul over the lies and the constant
masking of my true nature have become too much for me.
I expect to be Zotted immediately, you have broken me down and forced a full revelation.
Perhaps all true, but OTOH, you don’t pimp your blog...
That’s how they roll......the murderous ****!
I too fear they will do everything in their murderous power to take THIS off the news.
I hate blog pimping more than Apple Pie and Chevrolet.
I suggest you watch it and can the sarcasm.....OK!
Have to post IMR 4350’s analysis once again:
To: F15Eagle
Benghazi was Hillary’s version of the “spontaneous” lie.
Obama’s version of the “spontaneous” lie was the airline plot a few months before.
Hillary had the AP “leak” information and derail Obamas version of the spontaneous lie because Obama had left himself an opening to be reelected.
Once Obama’s version of the spontaneous lie was derailed their only option was Hillary’s version with Benghazi.
With Hillary’s version of the spontaneous lie Obama wasn’t supposed to be reelected.
With Benghazi they planned the attack, then they planned the protest in Egypt to created the spontaneous lie, then they came up with the video to explain the protest.
Benghazi was planned and was supposed to be another October Surprise II.
There wasn’t supposed to be anyone killed they were supposed to be taken hostage.
Hillary would come up with the “spontaneous” lie that there was zero planning and preparations for the attack which no one above the level of idiot was supposed to believe.
Hillary’s minions would then start a rumor mill campaign that Mitt Romney and the repubs had collaborated with the terrorist to take the hostages to make Obama look like Peanuts Carter.
With Obama loosing the election the October Surprise II rumor mill would go full tilt.
The hostages would then be released the day Romney took office to support the October Surprise II story.
This would leave Obama and Hillary a defense for arming up the terrorist.
They would simply claim the CIA was in Benghazi rounding up the weapons and the republicans collaborating with the terrorist to attack the compound is how the terrorist got the weapons.
Once congress started having hearing on Benghazi, the dems would be claiming October Surprise II.
The republicans would then claim the terrorist simply picked up on the dems praising Peanuts Carter at their convention and planned the attack.
In effect the attack was “spontaneous” that no one in this country had collaborated with the terrorist in planning and making preparation for the attack, the terrorist simply picked up on a news story and “spontaneously” planned an attack around it.
In 2016, when Hillary was running against Romney, Romney would be saddled with the October Surprise II rumor.
It’s no different that Hillary concocting the “Bush Knew” story about the 9/11 attack.
Exact same strategy.
23 posted on 9/4/2014 8:29:10 AM by IMR 4350
I can’t wait,maybe after 2 years someone will ask the question Why was our ambassador in a country club surrounded by terrorists in the first place? Have not heard that asked yet.
If you get that answer you will know why they had to lie about the video,why they did not send any air cover or anything else
Stevens had taken up in the ‘consulate’ which the Brits had abandoned three weeks earlier due to intel of attack.
‘Which’ muslims will zero stand with should ugly winds face them?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3XSI_xwvss
If you look at your reflection in the bottom of a well,
What you see is only on the surface.
When you try to see the meaning, hidden underneath,
The measure of the depth can be deceiving.
The bottom has a rocky reputation
You can feel it in the distance the deeper down you stare.
From up above it’s hard to see, but you know when you’re there.
On the bottom words are shallow.
On the surface talk is cheap.
You can only judge the distance by the company you keep
In the eyes of the Confessor.
And you wonder why I say you seem to be “sensitive”.
Debating ideas is beneath you. Answering questions is beneath you. You’re not going to be led about by anybody else, which is what you assume questions are intended to do. And whenever I mention Obama’s disinformation campaigns you imply that I’m just trying to attack anybody who disagrees with me, as well as assuming that it’s you who I’m talking about.
The other people I know who think like that are my teenage daughters - but only at the wrong time of the month. lol
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.