Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Upheaval in Kansas Senate as election official rules Dem can´t withdraw
The Hill ^ | 9/4/14 | Alexandra Jaffe

Posted on 09/04/2014 8:48:14 PM PDT by Nachum

Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach (R) has denied Democrat Chad Taylor’s request to be removed from the Kansas Senate ballot. His Thursday decision means Sen. Pat Roberts (R-Kan.) will face three candidates on the ballot this fall — Taylor, independent Greg Orman and libertarian Randall Batson — boosting the vulnerable senator’s reelection prospects. Now, Taylor could siphon off enough anti-Roberts votes from Orman, who’s been surging in the race and is now seen by Democrats as their best shot to take Roberts down, to deliver the senator an opening for a win. Kobach told reporters that, after evaluating state

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Kansas
KEYWORDS: chadtaylor; kriskobach; patroberts
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: Nachum
"this would be uneven enforcement of the law by a different standard."

Oh Noes! Uneven enforcement of the law? Someone needs to get this information to Eric Holder at the Justice Department. This country can't have "uneven enforcement of the law"!

21 posted on 09/05/2014 4:25:04 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (The Stone Age didnÂ’t end because we ran out of stones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sunmars
Rules are if he withdraws, he has to have good reason to and if he does, Dems have to replace him on the ballot anyway....They didn’t read the rules..

All moot anyway as Ballots have to start printing tonight. So they have no time now to mess about.

Hope they can’t get a “stay of execution" long enough to rub out Taylor and cross-endorse Orman . . .

22 posted on 09/05/2014 8:49:18 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion ("Liberalism” is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

The Torrecelli/Lautenburg analogy is a false one, IMO. In that case, the Dems wanted to get a loser off the ballot and replace him with a corpse who had name recognition. The argument hinged on the voters right to a choice on the Democrat line of the ballot.

In this case, the Dems want to remove the name of their radioactive candidate and have no intention of replacing him as required by Kansas law should a withdrawal be allowed. They don’t want the voters to have a choice on the Democrat line, hoping that they will vote for the phony Independent, Orman.

What happens if the Democrats refuse to name a candidate, or stalls? Ballots need to be printed so that absentee ballots can be mailed to the military overseas. The Kansas Secretary of State is responsible for ensuring that that occurs. Don’t the Democrats of Kansas who selected Taylor in their primary have a right to vote for him in the General Election? What is the judge going to say about that?

The particular language in the statute has never been challenged in court. I cannot imagine a scenario where the court could make a timely ruling that will inevitably be appealed to the Kansas Supreme Court. The Secretary of State had to rule as he did yesterday, according to law. Now he has to act according to law and print the ballots with Taylor’s name on them.

One more point, Kansas is not New Jersey.


23 posted on 09/05/2014 9:38:02 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: aft_lizard; Purdabo 248

All my life I dreamed that some day Republicans would be in charge of everything. My parents always told me that would result in a real change in this country. My father was born when Coolidge was president, so it’s been a while.

So, when we finally had a Republican president and Republcans in the majority in both houses of Congress, I was overjoyed. What happened? They spent money like Democrats. They stopped doing what worked in Afghanistan and sent our troops on nation-building invasions that anyone with any sense of military history could have seen would fail. They grabbed all the pork they could get for their districts and states and blathered about fairness and compassionate conservatism and generally pandered to liberals and morons.

Voters, who were told they would get prosperity, less government, and swift revenge over Islamic nuts at very little cost to us, turned against the Republicans and this brought us a true Commie president, BO.

Some of the worst judges were appointed by Republicans. Some of the biggest expansions of government spending and federal overreach were either instigated or supported by Republicans. We still don’t have a Republican with the courage of a Geert Wilder to speak the truth about Islam and what really needs to be done. We don’t hear much from supposedly Christian Republicans about the promotion of homosexual perversion or of the propaganda going on in the government schools. How many Republican politicians are promoting school choice in any meaningful way? Maybe a few, but in muted tones for certain audiences only. I would faint if any of them actually suggested the real solution, which is to get government out of education at all levels.

Oh, I will vote Republican this fall, but color me skeptical that it will matter. I felt the Republican party had sold its soul to the devil when Bush the elder didn’t lambast that whiny weasel who asked about government being his daddy. That is when the canary in the coal mine did a nose dive off the perch.

The real problem is not the politicians, of course, it is the voters. If Americans wanted smaller government and less spending, we would have it. I’m afraid it will take a huge economic crisis to make an impact, and it’s not going to be pretty. We may even see a civil war and the US break apart.

I’m not a glass half-full person or a glass half-empty person. I’m a “the glass is cracked and leaking all over the place” person. ;-)

Suggested reading: We Are Doomed: Reclaiming Conservative Pessimism by John Derbyshire

Cheers!


24 posted on 09/05/2014 1:17:54 PM PDT by Pining_4_TX (All those who were appointed to eternal life believed. Acts 13:48)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

Weird deal, here, though. It’s not that they have a replacement DEMOCRAT to put on the ballot, but are withdrawing so someone NOT from their party can win.

But, yeah, all you pessimists are probably correct - some judge will rule in favor of the democRats regardless.


25 posted on 09/05/2014 1:19:58 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sunmars

“All moot anyway as Ballots have to start printing tonight. So they have no time now to mess about.”

Cite for me the instance in which time constraints prevented Democrats from cheating, lying or stealing an election.


26 posted on 09/05/2014 7:35:23 PM PDT by Rembrandt (Part of the 51% who pay Federal taxes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Pining_4_TX

Yep and that was the reason for voting for Orman. Now this effort to get Orman across by the left. I may not vote in the race.


27 posted on 09/08/2014 1:12:15 AM PDT by Mozilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson