Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Carl Vehse

Well, no.

Absent a senate that will convict, there is no reason to indict.


27 posted on 08/30/2014 6:12:50 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12 ..... Obama is public enemy #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: bert
Absent a senate that will convict, there is no reason to indict.

False.

33 posted on 08/30/2014 7:34:14 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: bert
"Absent a senate that will convict, there is no reason to indict."

To the contrary, there is a VERY GOOD REASON for the House to indict Traitorobama and his regime that each Representative acknowledged when he took office:

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.

Patriotic Representatives should uphold that oath, even if the Demonicrat Representatives (and Senators), being lying, murdering traitors themselves, willfully violate their oath of office.

38 posted on 08/30/2014 8:03:41 AM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson