Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jacquerie

I just want the option “none of the above”, which if it received the majority of votes would mean the parties would have to present new candidates for an election.


5 posted on 08/29/2014 4:31:31 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Smokin' Joe

Yes !


11 posted on 08/29/2014 7:19:31 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Smokin' Joe; fieldmarshaldj; BillyBoy; AuH2ORepublican

This kind of thing is often mentioned, I have trouble seeing it work. What if the second election results in the same thing? Pretty soon it’s January and the new terms starts, who is running things? Who is paying for these extra elections?


13 posted on 08/29/2014 11:00:15 PM PDT by Impy (Think for yourself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson