He's a good boy, loves his Imam
Loves Allah and Kenya too
He's a good boy, crazy 'bout golfing
Loves homos and his boyfriend too
Posted on 08/29/2014 8:32:22 AM PDT by pinochet
In case you have not noticed, opposition to gay rights and gay marriage is weakening, even in conservative Christian churches. One friend suggested that many unmarried men who are heavily involved in church activities are stereotypical good boys, who maintain long periods of avoidance of heterosexual sex, which makes them more inclined to gay feelings. Is this true? A lot of men involved in church choirs seem more feminine than average.
The grandson of the famous televangelist, Oral Roberts, recently announced he is gay: http://www.christianpost.com/news/oral-roberts-grandson-discusses-coming-out-as-a-homosexual-52483/
Sons of many famous conservative Christians are ending up gay, such as the sons of Randall Terry, Phyllis Schlafly, etc. Jerry Falwell's Liberty University has ended public opposition to gay marriage, according to this article: http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2013/03/falwells-college-goes-quiet-on-gay-marriage.html
He's a good boy, loves his Imam
Loves Allah and Kenya too
He's a good boy, crazy 'bout golfing
Loves homos and his boyfriend too
Not to mention a great many samurai. Not exactly good boys.
Another attack on virtuous men and boys, nothing more.
Maintaining "long periods of avoidance of heterosexual sex" is, if the person in question is single, what we used to proudly call chastity and it is the just obedience to a commandment of God. To say that chastity inclines one towards "gay feelings" is akin to saying that is God's plan, which is clearly a blasphemy.
It’s soy that does it.
I am using an android smart phone so it takes some practice to comment with it (for me anyway).
That's right. It saps and impurifies your precious bodily fluids.
I'll try to phrase this delicately. "Chastity" and "gay" are two words that are not associated as commonly as you might think. And speaking strictly for myself, the word that is associated with periods of abstinence is "horny", not "gay".
I’m a good boy. Good looking, single and turn 51 in two weeks.
I love women and no one is confused about that fact.
Just had coffee with a friend and she asked if I was ever going to marry.
“Nope!”.
ROTFLMAO!!!!
You are so stoopit! /S
Ah gawd, that was funny!
The most violent human beings were homosexually inclined. Probably because the gay sex act itself is a violent or humiliating act to the victim.
I think a lot of people have this false idea that gays somehow are these funny prancers that don't know how to fight or be violent.
If that is the case, there would be no gay sex in prisons. Thus endeth the lesson.
Put some Nutella on it.
Should work better after that...
My fingers are fat enough.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.
Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.
Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.
Not getting sufficient (hetero) sex certainly doesn’t make me think about men. It just makes more women attractive /grin
Avoiding heterosexual relations makes me want a heterosexual relation more. It doesn’t do squat to make me want a man, dog, ewe or some other substitute.
I was a church going virgin when I married at 28. It did not make me lust after men - not wired that way.
I think it is highly relevant that until at most the last century, no society of which I’m aware classified men as straight or gay. IOW, there was no real concept of sexual orientation as a source of identity.
There were always men who had sex with men. Or, more accurately, with boys. Grown men having sex with each other was almost always considered highly deviant.
In most societies sex between men and boys was a matter of moral indifference for the active partner, and a source of shame and stigma for the passive partner. This ties in with the division between he-man homosexual active partners and effeminate passive partners. In most societies, it wasn’t the identity of the partner that was important, it was the submission or domination.
In some, notably the classical Greeks, men having sex with boys was widely considered the most admirable aspect of society. But men who were unable or unwilling to also have sex with women were almost universally disliked/despised.
A relatively few societies, historically speaking, criminalized the act, usually calling it sodomy. But in many of them the laws were seldom enforced, and almost never against any but the powerless.
Good point. We aren’t really bad. The feminist gay culture says straight men are innately “bad”, thus leaving gay men to be “good”.
I’m not going to die of AIDS. Guess that’s the price I have to pay for being a bad man.
And people constantly in and out of prison accept gay sex, but prefer women when they are out.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
