Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance
Actually, the legal arguments are right on target. The Federal government had the authority to impose those requirements on those western states because a Federal statute in place at the time gave the Federal government authority over the marriage laws of U.S. territories that were not states and therefore had no state laws to govern the institution of marriage.

The legal argument presented today ... and from my standpoint it's a very compelling one ... is that the Federal statute governing marriage in those territories effectively became null and void once those territories adopted their own marriage laws after they were granted statehood.

14 posted on 08/27/2014 7:32:48 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("What in the wide, wide world of sports is goin' on here?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

They were required to put it in their state constitutions. That was the deal.


20 posted on 08/27/2014 7:53:44 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson