Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court to Police: No Immunity Just Because You're Cops
Reason ^ | August 27, 2014 | Jackson Kuhl

Posted on 08/27/2014 6:24:08 AM PDT by bamahead

On a Sunday afternoon in 2008, a tactical police team raided the Easton, Connecticut house of Ronald Terebesi searching for a small amount of personal drugs. While by day's end the police discovered drug paraphernalia and 0.02 ounces of a substance believed to be crack cocaine, an officer also killed Terebesi's unarmed guest, Gonzalo Guizan (pictured), by discharging his Glock sidearm six times until the weapon finally jammed.

Guizan's estate and Terebesi filed civil suits against the officers in the raid, although the estate later settled out of court for $3.5 million. The tactical team—called SWERT for Southwest Regional Emergency Response Team—was composed of police officers from six different towns. The defendants, all of whom either planned or participated in the raid, requested summary judgment based on qualified immunity, which the district court for the most part denied (the court agreed police had lawfully acquired the search warrant and dismissed failure-to-train claims against the town chiefs). The defendants appealed.

On Thursday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second District affirmed most of the lower court's denial of summary judgment and remanded the case.

--SNIP--

The Appeals Court affirmed the district court's denial of summary judgment on every point save one ... Solomon was within his rights to activate the SWERT team in the first place (the town of Easton, probably upon reviewing their insurance premiums after the settlement with Guizan's estate, appears to have disagreed: Solomon's contract was not renewed and he was shown the door). But on every other count the court tilted in Terebesi's favor, noting that the use of stun grenades, being pinned by the officers' shields, the poor planning and approval of the raid, and even the failure of officers to intervene to stop it are constitutional grounds for a trial.

(Excerpt) Read more at reason.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: donutwatch; jbt; policestate; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 08/27/2014 6:24:08 AM PDT by bamahead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; albertp; Alexander Rubin; Allosaurs_r_us; amchugh; ...



Libertarian ping! Click here to get added or here to be removed or post a message here!

2 posted on 08/27/2014 6:26:13 AM PDT by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bamahead; Alaska Wolf; DCBryan1; Slings and Arrows; Doomonyou; napscoordinator; Shimmer1; ...
JBT Ping list

Correction: And NOT Get Away With It!

3 posted on 08/27/2014 6:26:54 AM PDT by null and void (If Bill Clinton was the first black president, why isn't Barack Obama the first woman president?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bamahead

This is good. Nothing is going to change until the officers involved in this nonsense are held personally liable for their actions.


4 posted on 08/27/2014 6:28:13 AM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bamahead
thanks, for the post. 🔫
5 posted on 08/27/2014 6:29:18 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (The end move in politics is always to pick up a weapon...eh? "Bathhouse" 0'Mullah? d8^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bamahead

Fighting back ping to self.


6 posted on 08/27/2014 6:29:23 AM PDT by SpeakerToAnimals (I hope to earn a name in battle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bamahead

I think the solution to this is for the cops to have to carry malfeasance (malpractice) insurance, and have it be at their own personal expense, by law.

Let the actuaries put the bad cops in another line of work.


7 posted on 08/27/2014 6:29:31 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bamahead

Only when bad cops are held accountable instead of protected, then things will change.
This is a start.


8 posted on 08/27/2014 6:31:53 AM PDT by Darksheare (Try my coffee! First one's free..... Even robots will kill for it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bamahead
Good.

/johnny

9 posted on 08/27/2014 6:32:53 AM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bamahead
(the court agreed police had lawfully acquired the search warrant

Why is there never repercussions for the judges that approve search warrant applications. those judges are supposed to be the control on overeager cops. Rubber stamping these applications defeats the purpose of having judicial review.

10 posted on 08/27/2014 6:35:54 AM PDT by oldbrowser (We have a rogue government in Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bamahead

if the cops want to be soldiers, they should enlist


11 posted on 08/27/2014 6:36:04 AM PDT by yldstrk ( My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldbrowser

Exactly.


12 posted on 08/27/2014 6:36:52 AM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bamahead

Just a generic observation and NOT to defend bad cops:

I don’t know where whole societal groups who gladly accepted a completely unvetted Presidential nominee are in a position to demand a more and greater vetting process for local law enforcement.

It is like having it both ways.

OK-so now, flame me.


13 posted on 08/27/2014 6:37:51 AM PDT by SMARTY ("When you blame others, you give up your power to change." Robert Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
This is a good thing. Actions and choices have consequences, even for law enforcement personnel.

Anyone else wonder how/why a Glock jammed after only 6 rounds? What, did he never, ever clean it? I can get my wife's little Ruger 380 LCP to jam fairly easily by limp-wrist firing. I can even get her Smith and Wesson M&P 9C to do the same. Same bad techniques tried on my Glock G19 though and all it does is kick the brass straight back into you. (excessive muzzle rise) Wonder if it was bad ammo.

14 posted on 08/27/2014 6:39:31 AM PDT by ThunderSleeps (Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bamahead

What do you know? As soon as lefties get upset about “militarized policing” we get an appeals court ruling that starts rolling back cops’ immunity.


15 posted on 08/27/2014 6:39:48 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bamahead
"...discharging his Glock sidearm six times until the weapon finally jammed."

But, IMPOSSIBLE!

Glocks are magical and never fail, OMG!

16 posted on 08/27/2014 6:39:54 AM PDT by fireforeffect (A kind word and a 2x4, gets you more than just a kind word.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY
It is like having it both ways.

No flamage needed. You are right. Liberals want it both ways. They don't understand the cognitive disconnect.

17 posted on 08/27/2014 6:47:51 AM PDT by IYAS9YAS (Has anyone seen my tagline? It was here yesterday. I seem to have misplaced it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Did You Know?

The Current FReepathon Pays For The Current Quarter's Expenses?

Now That You Do, Donate And Keep FR Running


18 posted on 08/27/2014 6:50:15 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB
Let the actuaries put the bad cops in another line of work.

The genius of the market in action!

19 posted on 08/27/2014 6:55:15 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ThunderSleeps
Machines fail.

Glocks, H&Ks, Colts, and Khars. It does not matter.

Somewhere around 10,000 rounds whatever you magic people popper is, it will fail. It may just be a lack of accuracy, but it will not work as well as new. When I was an armorer, we had some 1911’s that were made in 1943 (Remington-Rand's). They had the CPE of an North Korean ICBM at 100 feet, but always went bang.

On the plus side, you can you can take the old ones and put a .22 slide on them and they have a new life.

20 posted on 08/27/2014 6:55:52 AM PDT by fireforeffect (A kind word and a 2x4, gets you more than just a kind word.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson