Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ConservingFreedom
I've seen a number of libertarians agree that certain acts are best avoided but nonetheless none of government's business.

So. Getting back to the issue of child pornography that was left on the table earlier; this is none of the government's business?

And if I may drag in your pro-dope agenda, may I also conclude you oppose the government setting laws restricting sales to minors?

Gee, you're a very open minded individual, aren't you. Very liberal minded.

114 posted on 08/26/2014 9:13:07 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]


To: Responsibility2nd
Getting back to the issue of child pornography that was left on the table earlier; this is none of the government's business?

And if I may drag in your pro-dope agenda, may I also conclude you oppose the government setting laws restricting sales to minors?

No and no. Minors are, by virtue of their not-fully-developed reasoning ability, not capable of giving meaningful consent to many acts, including drug use and sex.

117 posted on 08/26/2014 10:41:49 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson