[fishtank]

ICR article image.

[MIchaelTArchangel]

I see these “fully human Neanderthals” all the time panhandling at intersections around the city.

[DManA]

Obviously they were fully human since they were able to mate with “humans” and bear fertile offspring. We’ve known this for decades.

[null and void]

If they can interbreed, they are by definition the same species.

[Cowboy Bob]

Neanderthals were superior to modern man. That’s why they were killed off. It’s happening again today.

[billorites]

"New Finds Reveal Fully-Human Neandertal"

Currently employed as a bank vice-president in the trust department.

[molson209]

Neanderthals are alive and well and living in Russia

[Alex Murphy]

Were they found near what the government describes as unexploded WWII ordinance?

[BenLurkin]

Something’s missing.

[frithguild]

Neandertal, Denisovan, modern man, plus an unidentified variation of man.

Unidentified is Yeti?

[BCW]

“...evolutionary continuum that spans from apes to modern man.”

Didn’t they just release the full spectrum of comparison between man and ape - where the DNA chain is completely and far from being the same...??? This initial theory was based off a small analysis between man and chimp/ape - but now that the full analysis has been complete, it has been shown that there is a large gap and no common ancestor...

Article:

https://answersingenesis.org/genetics/dna-similarities/what-about-the-similarity-between-human-and-chimp-dna/

Because of this similarity, evolutionists have viewed the chimpanzee as “our closest living relative.” Most early comparative studies were carried out only on genes (such as the sequence of the cytochrome c protein), which constituted only a very tiny fraction of the roughly three billion DNA base pairs that comprise our genetic blueprint. Although the full human genome sequence has been available since 2001, the whole chimpanzee genome has not. Thus, much of the previous work was based on only a fraction of the total DNA.

[FourtySeven]

This is very interesting but I don’t see this finding supporting a literalist approach to Genesis (as I assume the ICR advocates).

Something that really strikes me about neanderthals and similar “peoples” throughout pre-history is just that: that they are prehistoric in the classic sense. (Their existence goes back farther than 6-10,000 years.)

We’re talking 20,000-50,000 years ago. The Australian Aboriginal people are another example of this who are still alive today.

The point is 20-50,000 years ago is clearly outside the literalist interpretation of Genesis.

[DJ MacWoW]

Free Republic

Click The Pic To Donate

Please Donate!

[Reeses]

Along with a fascination for phallic objects such as trains and tall buildings, the standard psychological test for the mental illness of leftism includes the question: “Do you fantasize about sex with Neanderthals?” It's a classic symptom of the disease. Leftist academics obsess about Neanderthal/Homo Sapien sex.

[lefty-lie-spy]

Perhaps there is another website with really stupid people that would like this junk. Not here.

[Verginius Rufus]

If I were a Neanderthal reading this, I would say, "Give us our H back!"

I know that the German word thal is now spelled tal, but that's no reason for changing the spelling of an historic name.

They were Neanderthals.

[citizen]

Read all about it in Jean Auel’s ‘Clan of the Cave Bear’ books.

[RichInOC]