Cornell, he's both and your faux outrage isn't fooling me. I think you're gloating.
You and I both know he's the most progressive marxist you've yet put in the highest of places AND he's counterfeit.
Hiding behind a sealed past, he's a false facade, both like a Hollywood set and the actor reading his lines.
How else would he have been able to fool ordinary Americans into voting for someone embodying the ideology we once went to war with merged with allah?
Your faux outrage is boring, man. Just go back to rubbing our noses in it like usual.
Cornell, he's both and your faux outrage isn't fooling me. I think you're gloating.
It's worth noting that this crowd doesn't use Clintonian Triangulation the way you'd expect.
For instance, Axelrod came out and said that the Texas indictment of Gov. Perry re: the drunk DA was wrong. In Clinton-land, you'd expect Axelrod to come out a few days later and say, 'well, I've looked at it closer and I think the indictment is justified'. That's how they push-pull opinion on the left; someone makes it ok to have an opinion and they all follow. But that's not what's happening here.
The old saying is that you never ascribe malice to that which can be explained by incompetence. I wonder if the left is coming to believe that they've got a dangerous incompetent narcissist on their hands? Will they remove him procedurally before he ruins the party for a decade or more?